HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

agucova

no profile record

comments

agucova
·8 months ago·discuss
FWIW I work on AI and I also trust Pangram quite a lot (though exclusively on long-form text spanning at least 4 or more paragraphs). I'm pretty sure the book is heavily AI written.
agucova
·8 months ago·discuss
How long were the extracts you gave to Pangram? Pangram only has the stated very high accuracy for long-form text covering at least a handful of paragraphs. When I ran this book, I used an entire chapter.
agucova
·8 months ago·discuss
I ran the introduction chapter through Pangram [1], which is one of the most reliable AI-generated text classifiers out there [2] (with a benchmarked accuracy of 99.85% over long-form text), and it gives high confidence for it having been AI-generated. It's also very intuitively obvious if you play a lot with LLMs.

I have no problem at all reading AI-generated content if it's good, but I don't appreciate dishonesty.

[1]: https://www.pangram.com/ [2]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.14873
agucova
·4 years ago·discuss
I think you may have demonstrated his point.
agucova
·4 years ago·discuss
Sure, but he is not arguing for toxic kindness.
agucova
·4 years ago·discuss
How does that change the toxicity he has observed? It's still as present, that doesn't do anything to change his argument.
agucova
·4 years ago·discuss
You can be skeptic and offer constructive critique while being kind. It's more about the attitude than the content of the message.