HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

benchmarkist

no profile record

Submissions

Data Processing Inequality and Unsurprising Implications (2018)

chrischoy.github.io
1 points·by benchmarkist·2 years ago·0 comments

[untitled]

4 points·by benchmarkist·2 years ago·0 comments

How close is AI to human-level intelligence?

nature.com
3 points·by benchmarkist·2 years ago·4 comments

Foundations of Algorithmic Thermodynamics (2023)

arxiv.org
4 points·by benchmarkist·2 years ago·0 comments

GCC Compiler vs. Human – 119x Faster Assembly (2023)

ashvardanian.com
2 points·by benchmarkist·2 years ago·0 comments

Information Theory: Obstacles to True Artificial Intelligence (2016)

blog.paulbohm.com
3 points·by benchmarkist·2 years ago·0 comments

Significant amount of methane escaping East Siberian Arctic Shelf (2013)

phys.org
3 points·by benchmarkist·2 years ago·0 comments

Beating GPT-4 with open source

blog.dottxt.co
5 points·by benchmarkist·2 years ago·0 comments

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman on AI governance, ethics, and innovation [video]

youtube.com
1 points·by benchmarkist·2 years ago·0 comments

Evaluating the Robustness of Analogical Reasoning in Large Language Models

arxiv.org
1 points·by benchmarkist·2 years ago·0 comments

Llama 3.1 405B now runs at 969 tokens/s on Cerebras Inference

cerebras.ai
427 points·by benchmarkist·2 years ago·156 comments

Modeling urban growth shows that cities develop in ways similar to tumors

phys.org
1 points·by benchmarkist·2 years ago·0 comments

Compilers for Free (2013)

tomstu.art
2 points·by benchmarkist·2 years ago·0 comments

The case for reducing existential risks (2017)

80000hours.org
4 points·by benchmarkist·2 years ago·0 comments

Existential Risk: Threats to Humanity's Future

existential-risk.com
1 points·by benchmarkist·2 years ago·0 comments

Automatic Differentiation in Ruby (2016)

tomstu.art
3 points·by benchmarkist·2 years ago·0 comments

Earth Could Be Alien to Humans by 2500 (2021)

scientificamerican.com
28 points·by benchmarkist·2 years ago·25 comments

comments

benchmarkist
·2 years ago·discuss
[dead]
benchmarkist
·2 years ago·discuss
[flagged]
benchmarkist
·2 years ago·discuss
[dead]
benchmarkist
·2 years ago·discuss
I don't eat meat and don't drive cars. How about you?
benchmarkist
·2 years ago·discuss
The universe does not have a finite symbolic description. Whatever meaning you attribute to the symbols has no objective reality beyond how people interpret those symbols. Same is true for the arithmetic performed by neural networks to flash lights on the screen which people interpret as meaningful messages.
benchmarkist
·2 years ago·discuss
How about we leave the silk worms alone.
benchmarkist
·2 years ago·discuss
Humans currently produce industrial poisons on an unimaginable scale so you're not far off.
benchmarkist
·2 years ago·discuss
Yet another instance of how people view the biosphere as a resource to be exploited for their own monetary profit and short-term benefit. That type of logic and thinking is a dead end. I've never had a silk robe and I doubt I would be any better off if I did have one. I'd much prefer clean air, water, and unpoisoned land for growing nutritious food.
benchmarkist
·2 years ago·discuss
The function/mathematics in an NN (neural network) is meaningless unless there is an outside observer to attribute meaning to it. There is no such thing as a meaningful mathematical expression without a conscious observer to give it meaning. Fundamentally there is no objective difference between one instance of a NN with one parameter, f(θ), evaluated on some input, f(θ)(x), and another instance of the same network with a small perturbation of the parameter, f(θ+ε), evaluated on the same input, f(θ+ε)(x), unless a conscious observer perceives the output and attributes meaning to the differences because the arithmetic operations performed by the network are the same in both networks in terms of their objective complexity and energy utilization.
benchmarkist
·2 years ago·discuss
It's a good essay but you didn't address my point.
benchmarkist
·2 years ago·discuss
How does math encode meaning if there is no Alice and Bob? You should quickly realize the absurdity of your argument once you take people out of the equation.
benchmarkist
·2 years ago·discuss
Here you go: https://g.co/gemini/share/852449bad133
benchmarkist
·2 years ago·discuss
And how do they do that? Be very specific.
benchmarkist
·2 years ago·discuss
I don't think there is any real value in making videos other than useless entertainment. The real inspired use of computation and AI is to cure cancer, that would be the right way to show the world that this technology is worthwhile and useful. The techniques involved would be the same because one would need to include real physical constraints like conservation of mass and energy instead of figuring out the best way to flash lights on the screen with no regard for any foundational physical principles.

Do you know anyone or any companies working on that?
benchmarkist
·2 years ago·discuss
I guess we'll never know.
benchmarkist
·2 years ago·discuss
I'd be embarrassed if I was a physicists and my name was associated with software that had phantom masses appearing and disappearing into the void.
benchmarkist
·2 years ago·discuss
My price is very cheap in terms of what it would enable and allow OpenAI to charge their customers. Hamiltonian video generation with conservation principles which do not have phantom masses appearing and disappearing out of nowhere is a billion dollar industry so my asking price is basically giving away the entire industry for free.
benchmarkist
·2 years ago·discuss
Unless you have $500k to pay for the actual implementation of a Hamiltonian video generator then I don't think you're in a position to tell me what I know and don't know.
benchmarkist
·2 years ago·discuss
Ok, have a good one dude.
benchmarkist
·2 years ago·discuss
[flagged]