I have a question..
As all these GPU cores are just used as computational acceleration for a CPU code, how the fuck they claim to have and control thousands of GPUs running one model inside a datacenter?
Are they just using too big arrays :) - it makes no sense to me. How many GPUs one CPU code may need? How many CPUs they have and How then these CPUs are running in parallel? Do they at all?????
If you want to cooperate - I am open for that and I can share more. But this is public knowledge and should stay that way. Why you are deleting my comments in youtube - I have apps with 100K+ installs using such method and I can share details if you are really interested
REMINDER!
You can not put your name under something that is on the market since 2019 in several products with more that 100K users just because you wrote some paper in 2025! You may use it, you may describe it, you may try to improve it but you can not title yourself an inventor :) You are just late to this!
No FFT in the showed apps. It is the very same algorithm you are trying to reinvent but adjusted for REAL world use by solving the REAL issues as accounting for natural harmonics and and balancing the resonator sensors output
It is more complex than the one described here. The idea is the same but for a working solution many different coefficients are needed and adjusted properly. Resonances are adjusted to have some match to the human perception.
It is all time domain as there are no real frequencies in sound.
It is good to see the idea investigated by more people but the man should not try to claim it as his own. We are doing such tings for years and I want this knowledge stays to people so no one should claim it
Great idea! In my OS distribution - OnemanBSD (https://bialamusic.com/onemanBSD/) I found out that to include browser with Javascript, it would eat more time to build it than to to rebuild the entire OS with the included apps.
No single person can understand what is inside that monster. It could be any code injection
I wanted an OS that I could truly own. Most modern systems have become server-controlled clients, bloated with dependencies (Gtk3/Qt) and centralized source control on GitHub. If you cannot audit the dependency tree and Big Corp controls the source, it is no longer real open source.
I built OneManBSD to address this. It is an OpenBSD-based system built on a single 2012 ThinkPad L430.
Key features:
* Self-Containing: The installer image includes the full source code for the kernel, base, Xenocara, and required ports.
* Offline Rebuildable: You can rebuild the entire world from local source on the same machine without an internet connection.
* Minimalist: No big Gtk, no Qt. It uses JWM as a window manager and prefers clean C/C++-based apps.
* Diversification: I’ve intentionally avoided centralized version control and source binary separation. I believe "the more versions, the better" is the path to digital freedom.
I am looking for and hope to catch the interest of the 0.1% of developers (and future developers) who prefer freedom.
I don't understand why if something is not good for adults is labeled for kids?
Any old laptop will do do the job. Also if something is for kids it should have no WiFi/bt as it is health hazard.