HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

dcreater

636 karmajoined 4 years ago

Submissions

Yet another reminder why you should not use Ollama

github.com
6 points·by dcreater·5 months ago·5 comments

Claude Code's GitHub page auto closes issues after 60 days

github.com
39 points·by dcreater·5 months ago·22 comments

Ask HN: Coding agents struggle to get the current OpenAI API Spec?

1 points·by dcreater·7 months ago·0 comments

Collation of Claude Code Best Practices – v2

rosmur.github.io
3 points·by dcreater·8 months ago·1 comments

Office MCP Registry on Datasette

lite.datasette.io
1 points·by dcreater·9 months ago·0 comments

The importance of full-stack openness and verifiability

vitalik.eth.limo
2 points·by dcreater·10 months ago·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by dcreater·10 months ago·0 comments

comments

dcreater
·11 days ago·discuss
What does this do better than just asking your agent to "write docs" or a more robustly defined prompt/skill?
dcreater
·30 days ago·discuss
Sadly there is a pejorative context. The constant us, the free world vs China, the evil Soviets rhetoric from every major news establishment and executive creates that negative view
dcreater
·30 days ago·discuss
I've heard this claim before but I've never seen any evidence.
dcreater
·30 days ago·discuss
I really hope we stop using the term "Chinese models". It has this air of Negative connotation. It's the equivalent of calling cars Japanese, which people used to do but now is almost entirely meaningless. You just call them Toyota, Honda, Lexus etc.
dcreater
·last month·discuss
Was excited until I found out this is a YC company. And a stereotypical one by the sound of it ("pivot hell" blah blah).

If you're sell is being an unenshittified alternative to github, just give it time
dcreater
·last month·discuss
They announced RTX spark days ago. Why is this post linking to a "leak" tweet on the frontpage now?
dcreater
·last month·discuss
Why does a company with a seemingly health business model that is already churning profits and doesnt require large CapEx, taking losses to capture users, need to be raising this kind of capital?
dcreater
·last month·discuss
Why was it enabled for only 2 of the 5?

Other burning questions: What methodology was used to choose the question set? Why not allow explanations? How many passes were done for each LLM?
dcreater
·2 months ago·discuss
And for requiring you to login with an email account to use the terminal.. (They finally removed this after years of complaints, but I dont trust any company with this type of culture)
dcreater
·3 months ago·discuss
I cant buy credits - says page could not load
dcreater
·3 months ago·discuss
> from vibe coding to vibe investing

Excellent! This is exactly what we need!
dcreater
·3 months ago·discuss
I think it would be better if you shared a logic based argument as to why you disagree with him?
dcreater
·3 months ago·discuss
@dang
dcreater
·3 months ago·discuss
Yup this reads like post hoc revisionist marketing content rather than an engineers diary
dcreater
·3 months ago·discuss
Welcome to modern software
dcreater
·3 months ago·discuss
Its gotten so bad that its a meme on the macapps subreddit.

This is the unfortunate real face of open source. So many devs each making little sandcastles on their own when if efforts were combined, we could have had something truly solid and sustainable, instead of a litany of 90% there apps each missing something or the other, leaving people ending up using WisprFlow etc.
dcreater
·3 months ago·discuss
Nice vibe coded project. There are a few UX holes i've encountered so far: No way to go to the next lesson if we dismiss the modal (have to go back to the tree and then click the next lesson)? more hints or step wise reveal if user gets stuck will be very helpful
dcreater
·3 months ago·discuss
the part that tripped me up is 0 showing in deep RED and I thought that meant I was doing something wrong. I came here, read this and realized I was actually right and then pressed the Run tests button and passed. This is a UX thing you'd want to address
dcreater
·3 months ago·discuss
Yes, Its sad to see the reactionary hate triggered by a misleading article.

The number from 2025 is not really relevant when the layoffs were in March 2026. The article author clearly has a narrative they want to push.

And of the 436 petitions in 2026, only 235 are new hires (remaining are continuing approvals). Hardly a scandal there. Especially if they're likely hiring AI engineers and laying off call center employees - its not like their laying off an american citizen to hire a cheap H1B employee as this article is angling to have the reader believe.
dcreater
·3 months ago·discuss
Can you please open source the code?