It's true. The past is not a perfect indicator of future. This time it could be different. The transition wont be smooth and people in large number will actively try and stop technological progress.
We seem to be ignoring the current theoretical limitations of A.I. I'm not an C.S or A.I expert. But what I can remember from university is that we need a pretty big breakthrough in computer science to get to that stage. I'm not saying it won't happen. But who knows.
I dont know. I'm not an expert in Theoretical C.S.. But from what I can understand is that we need a pretty big break through in C.S to get to that point.
Sure some jobs will be replaced but new jobs will be created. Thinking on the spot now. A manager and a whole team of people that oversee the job that the A.I does. Jobs that focus on applying A.I to certain field, (A.I consultants)
People value human interaction and when there is value in something, there is money to be made.
I agree with the article. My friends and I have a complex lingo we use in our text messages and the lingo itself can sometimes be a topic of the conversation.
The "smart" replies seems to robotic and i'm sure many people would find it rude if they got them.
It seemed a bit forced in my opinion.