Who decides what is "important"? Who decides what is "over/undervalued"? What do you recommend, a new government agency to ensure that all people investing are investing in "properly" valued securities/coins/etc.? You say the coin is overvalued, however the average person obviously disagrees - this is the point and purpose of a free market. Supply and demand.
If you don't want to invest in something, don't. You shouldn't (and likely don't want) some other person or entity deciding what is best for you/family, so perhaps we should stop freaking out about things and/or telling other people how to live/spend/etc...
Also, what does climate change have to do with any of this? Attempting to use climate change, or the latest hot topic from FB, Twitter, etc. to then try to change everyone else's opinion (like you solved the puzzle of life, and not simply stumbled on something that is trending) is tiring and a bit ridiculous. NOTHING in life is this simple, including the market. I would say the markets are heavily pinned to sentiment, or more simply put how the majority of people feel about it.
Absolutely, "let the market be", and this is the choice people are making when they invest in something. People usually don't invest in X and say "okay, now rewrite the rules of the world for me because I think X is not the best place for money. I don't care about anyone else, people who invested in X need to immediately re-prioritize because I feel Y is more important than X and everyone else needs to think the same as well" Isn't this fascism? Is this really the world we want to live in?
You make your opinion on the market "heard" by taking part (investing) or not taking part (not investing), it's literally that simple.
If you want to invest in climate change, go for it - no one is saying not to, but on the flip side, you are inferring that everyone should NOT invest in DOGE so more money can go to climate change? I don't quite understand what the point here is.
If you don't want to invest in something, don't. You shouldn't (and likely don't want) some other person or entity deciding what is best for you/family, so perhaps we should stop freaking out about things and/or telling other people how to live/spend/etc...
Also, what does climate change have to do with any of this? Attempting to use climate change, or the latest hot topic from FB, Twitter, etc. to then try to change everyone else's opinion (like you solved the puzzle of life, and not simply stumbled on something that is trending) is tiring and a bit ridiculous. NOTHING in life is this simple, including the market. I would say the markets are heavily pinned to sentiment, or more simply put how the majority of people feel about it.
Absolutely, "let the market be", and this is the choice people are making when they invest in something. People usually don't invest in X and say "okay, now rewrite the rules of the world for me because I think X is not the best place for money. I don't care about anyone else, people who invested in X need to immediately re-prioritize because I feel Y is more important than X and everyone else needs to think the same as well" Isn't this fascism? Is this really the world we want to live in?
You make your opinion on the market "heard" by taking part (investing) or not taking part (not investing), it's literally that simple.
If you want to invest in climate change, go for it - no one is saying not to, but on the flip side, you are inferring that everyone should NOT invest in DOGE so more money can go to climate change? I don't quite understand what the point here is.