why would companies who build tools for developers say they'd want to replace humans with AI? it was never the goal, it was never stated like that. they said that by the end of 2026 most of the code being output would be generated by LLMs, and is pretty much true.
are we tho? i don't really see anyone going back to planning and coding by hand, that ship has sailed and it's not coming back. people ditching agentic workflows altogether would be failure, people figuring out it's not a miracle tool and has uses for which it's not as productive is correction.
>I don't think it's this because the outcome you get from AI isn't controllable. You can give it the best prompts and design suggestions and it'll still give you completely wrong or horribly written code.
sorry if it's not the case but i have the feeling you still think AI coding involves talking to a chatbox and copypasting the answers
the fact that you think an organization that pulled 300 million people out of poverty in 20 years with strategic planning and a controlled economy has this not covered is mind blowing. they killed the made in USA slogan in less than 40 years. they'll be fine.
i've noted less bugs on the windshield but about the same on the optics and the radiator screen, so i go with the aerodynamics explanation as well. bugs are there because i see the bug swarms around the road too.
in windows 11 i launch calc from win+r and it opens right when i hit enter. the delay is not from the launch dialog/OS but from the app (i use windows 7 calculator, i've replaced it because i don't like win 10+ calc design)
tbh those brain rot videos pre-date AI generation, i know because my little BIL used to watch those kind of random non-stop action and movement vids in like 2020
the chinese read marx and decided the only way is to overcome the limitations of capitalism through saturation of its potentialities under the rule of the workers party