dnial02 · HackerTrans

7 years agodiscuss

Interestingly, when I see the wikipedia page, the Jewish interpretation is nothing to do with stealing property, but by stealing person(kidnapping).

So the correct translation from Jewish tradition is thou shall not kidnap.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thou_shalt_not_steal

dnial02

7 years agodiscuss

Not OP, but I will answer with the second option and ask him what I should do?

dnial02

8 years agodiscuss

$1337 bounty is a symbolic number to signify the receiver is an elite hacker.

So, it's the meaning that counts, not the amount.

edit: source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leet

dnial02

11 years agodiscuss

It might work, but it will be another barrier of entry.

dnial02

11 years agodiscuss

The idea is that source code audit will not be the barrier of import. If the government request foreign company for source code audit they need to ask nicely, not with threat of banning import and sales of said product.

dnial02

11 years agodiscuss

I think the clause is there because China start to ask Tech company to open their source code if they want to do business there[0].

Which make me wonder, how do you distinguish between legitimate use of source code audit and the one that try to blatantly copy the source code?

[0] http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/telecom/security/chinas-n...

comments