HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

dreamsicle

no profile record

comments

dreamsicle
·4 years ago·discuss
These are the ROE's that permits them to bomb a car with water bottles and kill 10 civilians without recourse?

Careful what you wish for there...

You should look up the ROE for a roadblock.
dreamsicle
·5 years ago·discuss
Maybe, he'd certainly have a claim to it. Probably a harder one to defend since he chose to pursue instead of retreat and that Kyle chose not to fire despite having the opportunity to do so until after Grosskreutz had pointed his weapon at him. This all being on video.

Do you think the DA would have pursued charges against Grosskreutz for first degree murder?
dreamsicle
·5 years ago·discuss
You can read the law yourself and make your own conclusion, but even that's pretty unlikely:

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/948/60

Section (3)(c): 948.60(3)(c) (c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.

941.28 relates to NFA controlled SBRs. 29.304 and 29.593 are specific to those involved in hunting.