HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

eldenwrong

no profile record

comments

eldenwrong
·3 years ago·discuss
Not really but I understand that the word is used like that by people who haven't spent 30sec looking what it actually is

It really means no government or central authority dictating arbitrary rules enforced by violence.
eldenwrong
·3 years ago·discuss
Imagine going outside of your house and engaging in voluntary interactions the whole day. A horrible horrible world.

Thankfully the government and police make everyone behave due to the threat of violence. What would we do without them!!?

Anarchy doesn't mean no rules
eldenwrong
·3 years ago·discuss
Anarchy would be great and the chances of that are extremely small. I think you mean a total surveillance fascist dictatorship
eldenwrong
·3 years ago·discuss
Ever heard of the Azov battalion?

Oh sorry the US does it constantly by mistake. Its just stuck on a loop.

As if the government and the wealthy weren't extremely closely related. One even might say "twins"
eldenwrong
·3 years ago·discuss
Weren't most americans supporting the "war on terror"?

And weren't all your president approving drone strikes on kids and families for decades?

The level of propaganda that americans consume is not to different to the one of russians.

Ofc it didn't help that Ukraine was harboring entire Nazi battalions.

Just think if China was putting a military base in the mexican border and Mexico hired Nazis to fight for them. What would the international response would be like? Not too difficult to imagine eh?
eldenwrong
·3 years ago·discuss
Easy to say when your government has committed worse atrocities and you've never suffered for it
eldenwrong
·3 years ago·discuss
Not too different from americans believing the war on terror was about freedom.

Did they get any sanctions? Nah
eldenwrong
·3 years ago·discuss
Why are russians punished for the sins of their government? Should americans get the same treatment then?
eldenwrong
·3 years ago·discuss
It's just a spelling mistake.
eldenwrong
·3 years ago·discuss
The vaccine doesn't provide immunity. It doesn't prevent transmission, just lowers it. This is well known. It may lower sickness severity in older population. It also only lasts 2-3 months.
eldenwrong
·3 years ago·discuss
There was a recent paper published in Nature that shows this. Only observed in people who had breakthrough infections though
eldenwrong
·3 years ago·discuss
Yeah cause this type of vaccine doesn't provide immunity and the protection lasts a couple of months at most. Not to mention that repeated doses are started to be weakening the immune system
eldenwrong
·3 years ago·discuss
Yes but it would have been much worse without the vaccine
eldenwrong
·3 years ago·discuss
Uh most vaccines did offer pretty good immunity and an extreme reduction in transmission

They are not in the same category at all
eldenwrong
·3 years ago·discuss
Because the crypto space are just scammers. They barely know anything

People working on Bitcoin are very aware of this and it has been extensively discussed this in the last 10 years and taken into account even by Satoshi
eldenwrong
·3 years ago·discuss
Are there still reserve requirements in the UK? The US removed those
eldenwrong
·4 years ago·discuss
Don't buy bitcoin, buy my shitcoin

Its faster! Its new! Its more advanced!
eldenwrong
·4 years ago·discuss
>"Blockchains by definition are immutable post-finality."

This is the greatest misunderstanding. Immutability is NOT a property of blockchains. Its a property of Bitcoin and possibly Ethereum through PoW/PoS
eldenwrong
·4 years ago·discuss
Side effects of easy monetary policy and low education of the wealthiest population in the world.
eldenwrong
·4 years ago·discuss
Does it require 1 click?