HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

gilcot

no profile record

comments

gilcot
·5 months ago·discuss
Another loser here to second you
gilcot
·5 months ago·discuss
And that’s not true! He did want to keep the editor stable and available for many platforms and compatible with vi. Rejected proposals break one of these rules.
gilcot
·5 months ago·discuss
do you mean http://cream.sourceforge.net/
gilcot
·5 months ago·discuss
Merci.
gilcot
·5 months ago·discuss
I loved using it to write and browse my html files. It can do troff too <3
gilcot
·7 months ago·discuss
No, the editor is "ex" (for extended ed…) and "vi" is it's other face… (when you call vi, it’s same as calling ex then issuing :visual command…)
gilcot
·7 months ago·discuss
And they're "codenames" not supposed to be as obvious as names…
gilcot
·7 months ago·discuss
That's because "ed" was the "editor" (and that later was abbreviated "ed"…) when sed born.
gilcot
·7 months ago·discuss
As unique as: Go, Python, R, Rust, Word, Writer, --"
gilcot
·7 months ago·discuss
And before the rise of heavy IDE, you need some coffee to write all those SomeObscureWord.longLongStuf.notSoShortOne.LastSentence()
gilcot
·9 months ago·discuss
Do you mean doas ?
gilcot
·3 years ago·discuss
You were a github consumer.

You are now a git user.
gilcot
·3 years ago·discuss
You're supposed to write things like `\chapter{the title}` (so focusing on the content) instead of dealing with: font family/size/weight/variant/shape, text color/flushing/decoration, you know all those formatting you're always playing with with text editors for example.
gilcot
·3 years ago·discuss
And so will be in next century.