HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

jasrys

no profile record

Submissions

USCO: Copyright and Artificial Intelligence Part 2 Copyrightability Report [pdf]

copyright.gov
2 points·by jasrys·last year·0 comments

comments

jasrys
·last year·discuss
NASA tested one at Marshall about a year ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UShD03eG9IU
jasrys
·2 years ago·discuss
No one. At least in the US, copyright requires human authorship.[1]

There are several ongoing cases, probably most prominently the Thaler v. Perlmutter case. [2]

[1] https://www.copyright.gov/ai/ai_policy_guidance.pdf

[2] https://www.copyright.gov/ai/docs/us-brief-for-appellees.pdf
jasrys
·2 years ago·discuss
AI generated music is not protected by copyright, at least in the US, since copyright can only affix to works created by humans (the "human authorship requirement").[1][2] Without copyright protection, there is no "economic value" -- at least directly tied to the songs themselves. AI generated songs are not paid royalties at e.g. The Mechanical Licensing Collective for US streaming use.[3]

[1] https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-03-16/pdf/2023-0... (Copyright Registration Guidance section)

[2] https://ipwatchdog.com/2022/02/23/thaler-loses-ai-authorship...

[3] https://www.copyright.gov/ai/USCO-Guidance-Letter-to-The-MLC...
jasrys
·2 years ago·discuss
You can read more about what that deal covered — and didn’t cover — here on NMPA’s site:

https://www.nmpa.org/twitch-makes-deal-with-nmpa-but-streame...
jasrys
·2 years ago·discuss
They haven't licensed publishing (at least not yet). Source: am publisher