That's fair with regards to your statement, but "doubled112" assigned the agency to Microsoft, saying that "Microsoft bounces" their traffic, which is demonstrably not what is happening.
Nobody voted for it, that's true. But since reality held closely to it for decades right up to the present, it's reasonable to believe that transistors get smaller and cheaper as time passes.
Incorrect. A bounce is a delivery status notification generated by a mailer after it has already accepted a message for delivery. A 5xx permanent error is a refusal to accept the message in the first place.
I can't help myself digging into the referenced source code. The membarrier syscall can fail to allocate, returning ENOMEM. The way Folly calls it, the program would abort. Which I guess is a fair strategy but it's good to know when your synchronization primitive is actually SynchronizeOrCrash.
Nothing in this slop means anything particularly, but this detail is extra-wrong considering the variety of processors that the inventor says he used to create this algorithm.
Yeah I used it as well, in fact I kept using it pretty much forever because I had a comfortable VMWare image with all my apps installed and wiping out your Windows system back to a known-good checkpoint is the only reasonable way to use Windows. Unfortunately this retro scheme fell apart after they stopped developing Intel Macs.
Win9X wasn't Win2k's ancestor. Win2k was from the house of Windows NT. WinXP was the merger of the two lines.
Probably very few people switched from Windows 98 to Windows 2000. That wasn't considered an upgrade path. That was installing a different operating system.
I don't know why people fall for this stuff. It doesn't make any kind of sense. You put the panels in a rectangular array in any convenient place. That's what wires are for.
Staff SWE Bench: LLM doubts whether we should do any of this, calls the entire project into question, refuses to merge code, but is happy to delete it.
Exactly. The procedure is to read the description of the change to understand its motivation, goals, and overall design. Then you read the tests, checking whether they are compatible with and cover all aspects of what was described. Then you can read the code under test but at that point you enjoy the assumption that it at least passed those tests.
Another possibility that fits these facts is that everyone is impressionable at 10-15 years old.