HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

kagevf

no profile record

comments

kagevf
·28 days ago·discuss
Apparently, the Series library offers that. It didn't make it into the ANSI standard, but it's still maintained and covered in CLtL2.

edit SICP has examples on how to implement streaming (in Scheme).
kagevf
·6 months ago·discuss
From what I've seen, "AI" is typically written with the "Roman" (latin) letters, or translated as 人工知能 (AI) or as 生成AI (generative AI like LLMs).
kagevf
·7 months ago·discuss
Wikipedia is right; the romanization is just matching how it's rendered in kana.
kagevf
·7 months ago·discuss
I think your post pretty well illustrates how LLMs can and can't work. Favoriting this so I can point people to it in the future. I see so many extreme opinions on it like from how LLM is basically AGI to how it's "total garbage" but this is a good, balanced - and concise! - overview.
kagevf
·9 months ago·discuss
One approach would be to write code first, then run it by AI to get a critique. I think that strikes a good balance between avoiding atrophy and still getting the benefits of the tool.
kagevf
·2 years ago·discuss
To me, the form is not intuitive, but the result is:

  ((1 2) 3 4)
Someone else in that thread mentioned that CONS is basically adding (1 2) to the front of the (3 4) list, and that helped me understand it better.
kagevf
·2 years ago·discuss
I wrote "not *as* caustic" ... in particular, he wasn't being caustic toward Lee, but rather to the idea of cons pairs being redundant.

It's enough of distinction to make me think I should re-examine what Naggum had to say - in this and in other posts - and not get caught up in any pre-conceived notions I might have had about him.
kagevf
·2 years ago·discuss
He does have a tendency to write off people as “fanatics”.
kagevf
·2 years ago·discuss
This doesn't come across as "caustic" as when I previously read it. And the "bile" isn't directed so much at Lee as it is at something he wrote; "All in all, the pairs notion is redundant."

Naggum genuinely seems to be hoping that his long and thorough explanation will convince Lee of his point of view, and not as a put down.

> I hope you understand and appreciate what I have written above so the following does not apply to you anymore.

The "following" where he goes off on what Lee wrote, but not on Lee himself.

It might be worth it for me to re-read Naggum's posts, now that I have a better understanding of where he was coming from.
kagevf
·3 years ago·discuss
Get rid of the Windows key, and give me a ctrl and alt key on the right side. And some way to do "right-click"; usually S-F10 works, but I'm not sure those keys at the top are "fucntion keys".

To me it seems like it would be a major hassle to code without both of the ctrl and alt keys, but maybe the keyboard is so small it's not a factor anyway?