So one persons views implies everyones views? Also, so what? Is it against the law to have views. As long as his actions don't break the law, the freedom to think for yourself is paramount. Maybe he has reasons for his views that are compelling. Maybe he has life experiences that informed and shaped his views that are logical. Dismissal is lazy and stupid.
Yep. I'm a case in point. At the beginning of this thing i went along with
the mainstream narrative like a good sheeple. Now that i've watched how a narrative
can go from 'your a crazy person to believe there COULD have been a lab leak' to
'yahhh it was probably a lab leak the whole time'...my faith has probably been
permenantly destroyed in main-stream sources of information. Which sucks because
idealy i just want to focus on what i'm good at and let others do what they are good at. But now its been shown that the people who are supposed to take care of
gathering the facts and presenting them to the public have agendas and will lie if they see it fit. Not sure how any semblance of democracy survives with people like this in charge.
We can't let the sheep make up their own minds, we have to make up their
minds for them; for they are only sheep of course, and we are the pigs.
I mean, what would happen in one of those stupid sheep had a thought to
themselves? They might think
Hey isn't that a coronavirus reasearch lab right down the street? Maybe
they know something about this new coronavirus?
I mean, if they starting thinking...we might have a real problem on our
hands. Better lock it all down.
....
Human beings are built to defer to *legitamite* authority, its a
principle of how we organize ourselves. Doesn't matter if its mathematics
or goverment. But that legitamacy must be demonstrated. If a mathematician
fails to answer basic mathematical questions, then his authority on
the subject comes into question. When the authorities fail to answer
basic questions (like where did this virus come from? Why aren't we
investigating the wuhan lab? Why was Fauci funding it? Why was the man
in charge of the WHO investigation the man who was in charge of funding
it?), they are failing to demonstrate *legitamite* authority. In a
functioning democracy, that failure would be met with replacement.