HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

levn11

no profile record

Submissions

An Interesting Proof

techrxiv.org
1 points·by levn11·2 years ago·1 comments

Ask HN: I would like an honest discussion about this math proof?

archive.org
1 points·by levn11·3 years ago·2 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by levn11·3 years ago·0 comments

comments

levn11
·8 months ago·discuss
my life: https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...
levn11
·last year·discuss
i mean https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer......
levn11
·2 years ago·discuss
https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...
levn11
·2 years ago·discuss
so how much do you just stare at grass and yell at the sky
levn11
·2 years ago·discuss
I would make food shelters and start a school, a dream of mine.
levn11
·2 years ago·discuss
it follows specifically from the form on pages 1-3. i would recommend reading it with fresh eyes after a good night's rest.
levn11
·2 years ago·discuss
I won't reply further to this question about g, i do think i've been clear. and at this point you can be on your merry way still thinking it's wrong. but you simply misunderstood.
levn11
·2 years ago·discuss
it's a proof by contradiction. g would divide a+b-c IF a+b-c are integers.

for n=2, g(2)=(c-a)(c-b)g_1(2) and g_1(2)=2.

So only when n=2 is it true that g divides a+b-c.

Otherwise we get a contradiction that it divides. since then, g_1(n) for n>2 is not a factor of a+b-c, we can safely assume at least one of them was not an integer.
levn11
·2 years ago·discuss
i believe you skipped pages 1-3. g_1(2)=2 for all a,b,c with n=2. g(n) carries with it the assumption of a^n+b^n=c^n as i showed in pages 1-3.
levn11
·2 years ago·discuss
This is only true for a,b,c that satisfies a^2+b^2=c^2.

So a=b=3 and c=n=2 is not part of the solution set.
levn11
·2 years ago·discuss
https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...
levn11
·2 years ago·discuss
which part
levn11
·2 years ago·discuss
https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...
levn11
·2 years ago·discuss
Exactly. I have my degree as well, so I was doing some research of my own. It’s an ongoing thing.
levn11
·2 years ago·discuss
techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170629872.29614231/v1
levn11
·2 years ago·discuss
Seems like some kind of novel approach. Looks right to me. But my math is okay, so I need better eyes.
levn11
·2 years ago·discuss
https://figshare.com/articles/preprint/Fermat_s_Last_and_the...
levn11
·3 years ago·discuss
PLEASE read this as this is literally about thinking of center of mass as existing in more than 0 dimensions. the book is called The Zero Point Paradox and has everything to do about singularities
levn11
·3 years ago·discuss
They did nothing, apparently. Just kept on keeping on
levn11
·3 years ago·discuss
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Remote: yes

Willing to relocate: maybe

Technologies: i have a masters in applied math, i know python, i wrote a book, and i am publishing a math proof. But im also in need of employment.

Resume: I will email resume upon request, apologies i dont have a url set up for it.

Email: [email protected]