HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

m1n7

no profile record

Submissions

How the EU wants to protect its borders with artificial intelligence

fuckoffai.eu
1 points·by m1n7·2 years ago·1 comments

comments

m1n7
·2 years ago·discuss
https://codeberg.org/Postmill/Postmill
m1n7
·2 years ago·discuss
the links on the site are all just the same ref-link, is this spam?
m1n7
·2 years ago·discuss
which countries? china, the west?

more importantly, we should stop pointing fingers and act within our reach!
m1n7
·2 years ago·discuss
did carbon dioxide write this?
m1n7
·2 years ago·discuss


  only the threat of dismissal forces those unhappy ranks to do their job
or, you know, just pay them properly
m1n7
·2 years ago·discuss
https://github.com/sindresorhus/modern-normalize

  The goal of this project is to make itself obsolete.
m1n7
·2 years ago·discuss
a 0x return would be them getting back what they invested, right? (otherwise pretend i said 1-2x)

everything above that is a pointless perversion when capitalism is killing our planet and the majority population has to suffer, just because someone somewhere wanted bigger numbers...
m1n7
·2 years ago·discuss


  - 25% of investments make zero return (i.e. 100% write offs)
  - 25% produce a return greater than zero but less than 1x (i.e. are losses)
  - 25% produce a return between 1x-3x
  - 15% produce a return between 3x-10x
  - 10% produce a return of 10x or greater

  If you bucket the first two as "zeros" or near zeros, the third one as "something you wish you hadn't invested in" and the last two as good investments, you get to roughly the same 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 that I like to use.
so breaking even is bad all of a sudden... and who needs a return greater than 0-1x when everyone's getting paid and you have a little on the side for emergencies?
m1n7
·2 years ago·discuss
you can have sex without manipulating women...
m1n7
·2 years ago·discuss
i think it's possible to have both. we just haven't decided how to implement these improvements, that's why we see so many different immutable/snapshot/… distros with lacking ux — for now
m1n7
·2 years ago·discuss
are you implying that consuming media whilst blocking ads is stealing or do i just not get the sarcasm here. genuinely can't tell.

you're right about the second part i guess. not everything is intended for a public audience (like some cringe video clip with friends from a few years ago). with everything else (cinema, music etc.) i'd argue that my need for entertainment is more important than making sure some billionaires make 20 bucks on my purchase, especially if i can't afford it.

personally, i pirate everything and pay for stuff made by independent creators (foss devs, indie artists etc.) that i really like. perfectly moral
m1n7
·2 years ago·discuss
"you wouldn't download a car"

heck yes i would
m1n7
·2 years ago·discuss
In a perfect world it would respect the user's motion preference (maybe it does?)
m1n7
·2 years ago·discuss
English: https://archive.ph/OtzdY
m1n7
·2 years ago·discuss
nah you only need to do it once for subscriptions, but you can revoke access.

with other purchases it depends on the site. some ask you every time and others don't. i'd assume charges in the same range don't have to be approved again, but idk how it works exactly
m1n7
·2 years ago·discuss
just that the problem there is not with women working, but missing regulation. you shouldn't have to spend half your income on rent.
m1n7
·2 years ago·discuss
so… more coherent leads than the article claims, but still speculation.
m1n7
·2 years ago·discuss
that's only true as long as you have media that at least tries to inform the public with good journalism.

the dw is a fascist publication that only cares about making money off people with misdirected anger by spreading hate. it has no value.
m1n7
·2 years ago·discuss
bipartisanship between who?
m1n7
·2 years ago·discuss
doesn't matter how "in-depth" it is, it's still the daily wire and not trustworthy