HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

mxhold

no profile record

Submissions

Novo Nordisk's Canadian Mistake

science.org
5 points·by mxhold·last year·0 comments

[untitled]

2 points·by mxhold·last year·0 comments

State Bar of California admits it used AI to develop exam questions

latimes.com
8 points·by mxhold·last year·1 comments

Andrew Cuomo Used ChatGPT for His Housing Plan

hellgatenyc.com
1 points·by mxhold·last year·0 comments

Washington Post created a website to discourage its tech workers from unionizing

bsky.app
11 points·by mxhold·last year·1 comments

Something Is Happening to People Who Use ChatGPT a Lot

futurism.com
3 points·by mxhold·last year·1 comments

comments

mxhold
·last year·discuss
Interesting coincidence?

>On April 12, Coinbase updated their user agreement to take effect TODAY, May 15, with new language about waiving some rights to class action lawsuits and jurisdiction selection.

https://bsky.app/profile/jsweetli.bsky.social/post/3lp7sw647...
mxhold
·last year·discuss
I've always been a little uneasy about Vercel after trying to self-host Next.js on a VPS and running into a few of the little traps they seem to have set to nudge you into hosting on their platform instead. I get they have to pay the bills somehow but it does feel a bit risky to bet on their goodwill long-term.

The way they've handled this vulnerability has made me even more uneasy.

Vercel's initial framing of their Firewall as having "proactively protect[ed]" their customers definitely leaves a bad taste.

This, plus the delay in notifying other platforms, reveals a conflict of interest I had not previously considered: is Vercel actually less motivated to prevent such vulnerabilities from being introduced to Next.js in the future because they can roll out mitigations on their own platform before public disclosure and then say "well you wouldn't have been affected if you used us for hosting :)"?
mxhold
·last year·discuss
I really appreciate this post. I've always been a little uneasy about Vercel after trying to self-host Next.js on a VPS and running into a few of the little traps they seem to have set to nudge you into hosting on their platform instead. I get they have to pay the bills somehow but it does feel a bit risky to bet on their goodwill long-term.

The way they've handled this vulnerability has made me even more uneasy.

Vercel's initial framing of their Firewall as having "proactively protect[ed]" their customers definitely leaves a bad taste.

This, plus the delay in notifying other platforms, reveals a conflict of interest I had not previously considered: is Vercel actually less motivated to prevent such vulnerabilities from being introduced to Next.js in the future because they can roll out mitigations on their own platform before public disclosure and then say "well you wouldn't have been affected if you used us for hosting :)"?