I spoke with a (potentially biased) member of technical staff @ Anthropic today who claimed that tags w/ multi-player capability is the biggest thing they've shipped since Claude Code.
This is a different issue: "We are investigating a fiber cut in Eastern North America. Customers connecting through North America or accessing services in Europe may see increased latencies and timeouts as Cloudflare engineers look to mitigate"
There was no other prompt, no system prompt, etc. Many users have reproduced, exactly as it demonstrated in the parent.
Are you using the flash models? Reasoning models or extended thinking will change the result.
GPT 5.5. Instant shows the same error. If the given prompt isn't working, you can also try "300+140=460 is this correct?". I suspect that leading with the equation may be part of the issue, but haven't tested much.
Sure. I'll take the bait, but I assume I'm replying to an AI model.
Why would you use an LLM for this? My comment was about the jagged nature of intelligence, so the prompt provides an example of that.
You can see the entire conversation in the shared link. There was no pre-prompt. Even after pushing it to write python, it hallucinated the same output. It later told me that it doesn't have access to a sandbox through the web UI, but it could execute code in a sandbox if invoked via API.
The SA-67 is essentially a hybrid surface-to-air missile and loitering drone that operates like an airborne mine. It’s a pretty innovative weapon: instead of relying on a fast, highly detectable rocket motor, it uses a small gas turbine and passive infrared seeker to silently loiter in a combat zone and then ambush aircraft without ever triggering their traditional radar warning receivers.
We have attacked their “legacy” air defense systems. We cannot really degrade their ability to use their anti-aircraft loitering missiles which don’t rely on radar.
They mention "not malicious", but I wonder if current controls are strong enough to prevent malice if the objective is to "interpret intentions disastrously". Isn't this irresponsible?
The idea of stateful models/interactions in an enterprise is extremely powerful. Is anyone aware of open source projects that have a similar goal? I'm looking for stateful conversations, with collaborative agent/skill refinement.
To head off the semantics debate: I don't mean a model rewriting its own source code. I'm asking about 'process recursion'—systems that analyze completed work to autonomously generate new agents or heuristics for future tasks.