HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

pseale

no profile record

Submissions

The Power C Compiler

mixsoftware.com
129 points·by pseale·4 years ago·75 comments

comments

pseale
·4 years ago·discuss
First, let me just say that this seems great. It looks like a perfect way to use reasonable defaults (project name, Version) and use the existing `dotnet publish` infrastructure to make containers. And I love how the blog post has both a simple CLI example, and a GitHub Actions yaml example! So thank you.

Now for the problem:

I still don't understand why other people compile dotnet projects in containers. Today, we have a many containers built on a monolith, and it looks like if I make containers via `-p:PublishProfile=DefaultContainer`--for example, 20 containers--then that CI build is going to compile our codebase 20 separate times. With `-p:PublishProfile=DefaultContainer`, the long build is mostly duplicated in each container. Right?

So I have one major problem preventing me from adopting this: it's compiling in the container, which balloons our build time.

It's entirely possible I'm missing something obvious or misinterpreting the situation, and if so, please let me know. I'm mostly immune to feeling shame and appreciate feedback.
pseale
·4 years ago·discuss
This is like opening a time capsule and examining all the little details. Almost more interesting than the barebones, locked-in-time product page for a paid C compiler, is the locked-in-time cgi-bin-powered shopping cart page at http://www.safepay.net/cgi-bin/shop/cart.cgi?db=products.dat... (note it's an http link).

There's a whole host of old-school relics here--it is truly a blast from the past: paying separately for a debugger, paying for specific libraries, videos available on DVD.

It's really hard to express how deeply internet access has changed the landscape of ... well, everything, but in this particular case, the programming ecosystem. gcc probably existed back when I bought this compiler, and probably so did Borland's excellent pre-internet-era IDE, but I didn't know that. And so I bought this one.
pseale
·5 years ago·discuss
A reasonable high-enough DPI option I've been watching for a while is a 55" 8K TV. We're close to the 8K utopia!

- HDMI 2.1 can push 8K @ 60Hz over a single cable (though I am told the colors are not full range? https://twitter.com/MaratTanalin/status/1426726300585185284 - "Afaik, 8K@60Hz via HDMI 2.1 is only possible with either DSC compression or chroma subsampling — both are lossy.")

- A 3090 can push the pixels

- 8K TV prices have come down to ~$1500-$2000 - In theory, some combination of Game Mode and/or manually turning off all forms of picture post-processing can get you into good-to-good-enough input lag

If you want to wait for monitor manufacturers to manufacture 8K monitors, well, while it's inevitable, it'll be a while. But for the bold and stout of heart, for those willing to take risks, a new adventure awaits you. 8K