* MapCodes are shorter by 200-300% for a given accuracy level, assuming each MapCode is prefixed by a two-letter country code for clarity.
Cons of MapCodes vs. Geohashes:
* MapCodes only offer one accuracy level, of apprx. 100 m^2 regions, whereas a Geohash can be arbitrarily accurate.
* MapCodes do not guarantee persistence. They can be redefined at any time, for any reason, at the sole discretion of the project designer, leaving you with a nonreferential or falsely referential code.
* MapCodes do not encode location data within the code, so access to the server is required at all times. If you lack internet access, or if the service is DDoSed, hacked, goes out of business, etc. your codes become useless.
You can't ignore physical damage, but you can most certainly ignore attempts at emotional damage. Your emotions belong entirely to you. Nobody can change them on your behalf.
I'd argue that unprovoked violence is also an indicator of emotional immaturity (or other emotional problems), but bullies are a small minority of all males. Females who can't control their emotional reactions to external stimuli, on the other hand, are virtually all of them.
You answered a question about comparative scientist competence (which is highly objective, because it's judged on the basis of peer review of published work) with stats about elementary school grades handed out by teachers (which is highly subjective, because it's a virtually unchecked power, almost never judged by any outside auditor), not to mention the difference in age, task, environment -- basically every single criterion is different. It's not a question of liking anything. You're simply trying to move goalposts.
Judging by the various forms of intellectual dishonesty you've attempted thus far, I would gladly do my utmost to prevent anyone the least bit like you from finding employment anywhere near me for as long as I live.
Technically, "two" qualifies as "many", too, and two people among hundreds of millions is most certainly insignificant.
In general, if you can't demonstrate that a significant problem exists, it doesn't. The burden of proof is on the claimant, and they've certainly done nothing other than throwing some weasel words around.
Same difference.