HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

rtbtobi

no profile record

Submissions

unite + manage the world by a nat./logic. religion:reflect.,symmetry,1 datamodel

github.com
1 points·by rtbtobi·5 years ago·7 comments

How to unite and manage the world by a natural/logical religion

github.com
3 points·by rtbtobi·5 years ago·2 comments

comments

rtbtobi
·5 years ago·discuss
the mind of human and non-human animals in reflection; reflection as identity function

https://github.com/rene-tobner/unity#principle-1--the-mind-o...

"(reflection equals the identity function in lambda calculus; lambda calculus can encode math [math’s foundation/origin in counting: Y-combinator -> recursion -> Peano numbers -> counting in general -> addition/subtraction etc.] and logic)"
rtbtobi
·5 years ago·discuss
> the frustration at this stupid world we've created

https://github.com/rene-tobner/unity

Egovernment and identity management @ world-wide-wished-for-things.org ?
rtbtobi
·5 years ago·discuss
Ever thought about all those governments and complexity? Simplicity for unity: https://github.com/rene-tobner/unity
rtbtobi
·5 years ago·discuss
Collective thinking before collective action: https://github.com/rene-tobner/unity
rtbtobi
·5 years ago·discuss
Thanks for your comment! [edit] Did explain short term CA in abstract. And regarding my sweeping generalizations, well, I cannot do without (it's about math, too, see last remark of this paragraph). You're right, there's much fighting over interpretations of holy books' content and cultural norms, but anyhow a base text is made available. Regarding symmetry as beauty and good deeds, I had my headache about including it, but as mutual reciprocity/respect of citizens, that has some validity. The real reason, though, I included symmetry is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_relation : Symmetry is the second relation. I am not going abstract without a reason. In principle #1, you see THE foundation of math.

* Uniting humanities and natural sciences by the principle of reflection #+BEGIN_SRC One single root of natural sciences and humanities: reflection. #+END_SRC See Principle #1 below.

* How to unite and manage the world by a natural/logical religion

abstract

No other re-ligion (lit. "back-binding" [one etymological analysis of the word /religion/] to some ideas to rely on for humans) is necessary for a society, but only reasoned about principles (prin-ciple: the thing to grasp first , primus+capere): reflection, symmetry, cooperative construction (by too many Central Authorities [too-many-CAs] -> only 1 Central Authority [1CA]; see Cultural Principle below).

Evolved religions like Christianity also abide to following principles. Their followers do: 1. think/reflect about the world (our thinking: one instance of reflection) 2. they are in search of beauty, of beautiful/good actions/deeds (symmetry (1)) to form a sustainable society 3. they try to establish one text, one book, as core of their religion: an instance of a CA (among other religions with their corresponding CAs)

(
1) Seems like rather a far fetched argument, but who is not in search of beauty? The necessary association of beauty with symmetry anyhow is clearly shown in arts education about proportions, geometries of the human face or body. Good deeds and mutual respect/reciprocity of citizens, showing off characteristics of symmetry, too?!

Uncovering an abstract core of every human religion is our goal here for the betterment of education and world management. (Respect for every evolved religion is granted, but having different people adhering to different religions is not a good way to start thinking about a unity of humanity -- despite the potential of tolerance in various religions.)

The priciples reflection, symmetry, and cooperative construction are elaborated below.
rtbtobi
·5 years ago·discuss
Could you try to be less sarcastic? How else to start thinking about a possible unity? And, I'm talking about a unity of science and humanity. (Please, have a look at the page again, I added some examples!) That reflection is an important phaenomenon as proven in physics by double-slit-experiment, ok what could that mean for science if reflection can be seen as our mind's thinking, too? (humanities vs. nat. science) That one data store (this "book") is useful for making complex applications work ... many examples of this in programming: facebook's react/redux immutable data flow.

I am really asking about the logical beginning of perfect education/management of the world. No more superstition, and other errors...
rtbtobi
·5 years ago·discuss
humanties and nat. sciences should agree to a common root: reflection https://github.com/rene-tobner/unity
rtbtobi
·5 years ago·discuss
"Respect for every evolved religion is granted, but having different people adhering to different religions is not a good way to start thinking about a unity of humanity -- despite the potential of tolerance in various religions."

Respect means, everyone should be able to practice his or her religious beliefs. There is no banning intended. Rather some abstract layer is proposed here, every regular religion could connect to. Having any religious believer plus even atheists in one boat, might be some advantage.
rtbtobi
·5 years ago·discuss
What do you think the "United Nations" should do actually? Is the world so well?
rtbtobi
·5 years ago·discuss
No other re-ligion (= back-binding [one etymological analysis] to some ideas to rely on for humans) is necessary for a society, but only reasoned about principles: reflection, symmetry, cooperative construction (by too many CAs -> 1CA).

Evolved religions like Christianity also abide to following principles. Their followers do reflect about the world, they are in search of beauty (symmetry), they try to establish one text as core of their religion. Uncovering an abstract core of every human society is our goal here for the betterment of education and world management. (Respect for every evolved religion is granted, but having different people adhering to different religions is not a good way to start thinking about a unity of humanity -- despite the potential of tolerance in various religions. )

[edit] top link was wrong, so excuse this post again!
rtbtobi
·5 years ago·discuss
No other re-ligion (= back-binding [one etymological analysis] to some ideas to rely on for humans) is necessary for a society, but only reasoned about principles: reflection, symmetry, cooperative construction (by too many CAs -> 1CA).

Evolved religions like Christianity also abide to following principles. Their followers do reflect about the world, they are in search of beauty (symmetry), they try to establish one text as core of their religion. Uncovering an abstract core of every human society is our goal here for the betterment of education and world management. (Respect for every evolved religion is granted, but having different people adhering to different religions is not a good way to start thinking about a unity of humanity -- despite the potential of tolerance in various religions. )