You could also dive into the world of Effective Altruism which is broad and has a lot of tech related jobs. Check out https://80000hours.org and https://www.gfi.org
This test assumes a very specific type of AI, that is, one that is equal to humans but has been kept in the dark about parts of humanity. This assumption then must include its inability to teach itself new things, i.e. learn about those parts of humanity that were hidden from it, which then makes me skeptical of its abilities. Honestly I find this state of AI highly unlikely, but not impossible. More than that, even if you could create this type of AI and it is successful in this test, it still leaves room for doubt. It's interesting to consider that it would raise our Bayesian priors, but it proves nothing. I do think we should be striving to solve this issue but I'm skeptical we can without understanding consciousness in general.
Or... this could be an honest example and you don't have a full understanding of how "safe space" is used. You apply skepticism about a charged thing to a man you don't know who seems to be writing honestly about people he wouldn't normally fit in with and how other people have misunderstood them. Do you have space for self reflection on this? Twitter and MSM run on outrage. Would it be completely shocking to you to learn that you don't know the whole story?