HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

xtacy

no profile record

Submissions

[untitled]

1 points·by xtacy·3 months ago·0 comments

Performance Speed Limits (2019)

travisdowns.github.io
18 points·by xtacy·11 months ago·1 comments

A whirlwind tutorial on creating teensy ELF executables for Linux (1999)

muppetlabs.com
59 points·by xtacy·last year·17 comments

comments

xtacy
·3 months ago·discuss
Curious - what’s this court filing?
xtacy
·6 months ago·discuss
> QUIC is not bad, but there are places where it either does not work at all or works too slow.

Curious: in your experience where does QUIC work bad/slow?
xtacy
·11 months ago·discuss
Are there good public examples of well designed APIs that have stood the test of time?
xtacy
·11 months ago·discuss
Is it GBps (gigabytes per second) or Gbps (giga bits per second)? I see mixed usage in this comment thread so I’m left wondering what it actually is.

The article is consistent and uses Gigabytes.
xtacy
·last year·discuss
We do have a model. That’s statistical physics.

Any standard course goes over various derivations of classical physics laws (Newtonian dynamics) from quantum mechanics.
xtacy
·5 years ago·discuss
I suspect that the web server's CPU usage will be pretty high (almost 100%), so C-state tuning may not matter as much?

EDIT: also, RSS happens on the NIC. RFS happens in the kernel, so it might not be as effective. For a uniform request workload like the one in the article, statically binding flows to a NIC queue should be sufficient. :)
xtacy
·7 years ago·discuss
I think you meant to say -- Type 1 is a false positive, and type 2 is a false negative.