Dell to layoff 6,650 employees as demand for PCs plummets(theverge.com)
theverge.com
Dell to layoff 6,650 employees as demand for PCs plummets
https://www.theverge.com/2023/2/6/23587401/dell-employees-layoffs-tech-recession-falling-pc-laptop-sales
125 comments
PCs arent getting any better. We have pushed our replacement schedule out to at least 5 years now. Almost everything is web based and whatever isn't an ssd and a mediocre processor can do for almost anyone that isnt in engineering or development.
I think it's much worst than that. People are becoming "computer illiterate" as the phone has replaced the computer in most people's lives.
There will come a time when you and me will be the old guys with a milling machine and a metal lathe in our garage wondering why people don't make things anymore.
Or perhaps like the radio Hams. :-(
There will come a time when you and me will be the old guys with a milling machine and a metal lathe in our garage wondering why people don't make things anymore.
Or perhaps like the radio Hams. :-(
I've been on a 6-month YouTube deep-dive into electronics videos. I am also now seriously considering studying to become a Ham. This stuff is absolutely fascinating to me. It's too bad hardly anyone feels this way. Makes you wonder what will happen in a few decades. Will there be no one left who knows how to build computers? Will the engineers of the future be using software while having no idea how it works?
> Will the engineers of the future be using software while having no idea how it works
Aren't we already at that point? How many people can fully explain how a modern computer works, from the transistors up?
Aren't we already at that point? How many people can fully explain how a modern computer works, from the transistors up?
I'm losing interest in modern computers, except as tools. Vintage computers are much more interesting as a hobby because you actually stand a chance of being able to understand how the entire thing works, transistors up. It's also nice that a lot of the schematics and repair manuals are available for these old machines so you fire up an oscilloscope and fix just about anything that might be wrong, unless they use some hard-to-find custom ICs.
Had a blast with basic assembly, MARIE, etc. Genuinely enjoyed some of it, got to see how the sausage is made, understand from the ground up.
Then tried to get into forreal modern X86... and tapped out. Like, whoa.
Then tried to get into forreal modern X86... and tapped out. Like, whoa.
Probably an incredibly small number, depending on how you stringent you want to be.
But the same is true for cars, airplanes, microwaves, HVAC equipment, and most complex technologies.
But the same is true for cars, airplanes, microwaves, HVAC equipment, and most complex technologies.
First they said kids weren't using cursive so they started to drop handwriting classes in school.
Now they're saying kids don't know how to type b/c their primary interface is a phone keyboard.
Next step is probably Neural Link type connections where we eventually say "people used to user their HANDS to do things??"
Now they're saying kids don't know how to type b/c their primary interface is a phone keyboard.
Next step is probably Neural Link type connections where we eventually say "people used to user their HANDS to do things??"
As predicted in Back to the Future 2:
"You mean you have to use your hands?" "That's like a baby's toy!"
"You mean you have to use your hands?" "That's like a baby's toy!"
I actually considered mentioning this so glad someone else did!
Who is “they” and what percentage of the population does this group make up? We should try to do away with arguments that begin with “At least one person believed non-sensical thing X”.
I think in this case it's a complex intermingling of broad pubic sentiment and governmental policy driven by that sentiment (at some point, school boards had to make the explicit choice to deprioritize cursive and wood shop classes, those decisions tend to be made by groups of local individuals, but in aggregate the sentiment reflects a larger trend in the intellectual priorities of a nation)
I've been working with a recent college graduate, in STEM, who did not know Ctrl-C/Ctrl-V or Ctrl-S because they had essentially never used a desktop/laptop computer.
They had one, but it is something like my drill. It gets dusted off once every few years when there's no other option but otherwise sits on the shelf.
They had one, but it is something like my drill. It gets dusted off once every few years when there's no other option but otherwise sits on the shelf.
I am just repeating what I read on HN but it seems to be worse than that: some students arrive in college having absolutely no clue what files and directories are. Their frame of reference is that apps show their data when they open them.
ctrl-c or ctrl-z are easy to teach, practically trivia.
"here, do a copy... now paste... right click or use ctrl-[whatever]" boom. done.
those who don't know file structures are gonna require a little more help, but again that's not like rocket science. I could get a reasonably sharp 16 year old on that in a day or two.
It's not like driving a stick shift, in which case the noob will annihilator my transmission by not knowing; I can make the file system noobs create, delete, and move dummy files all week with no overhead.
"here, do a copy... now paste... right click or use ctrl-[whatever]" boom. done.
those who don't know file structures are gonna require a little more help, but again that's not like rocket science. I could get a reasonably sharp 16 year old on that in a day or two.
It's not like driving a stick shift, in which case the noob will annihilator my transmission by not knowing; I can make the file system noobs create, delete, and move dummy files all week with no overhead.
That's very surprising. All through the college they never had to write a paper? You can't write a paper on tablet/cellphone.
Google Docs on the phone has been very usable for a long time.
There really isn't much you can't do on a phone, it's whether or not you can take advantage of the facilities offered by the laptop/desktop.
There really isn't much you can't do on a phone, it's whether or not you can take advantage of the facilities offered by the laptop/desktop.
I would 100% lose my mind trying to write a paper on my phone. I don't want to imagine anyone typing out 20 pages like that.
There are plenty of colleges and degrees where nobody in undergrad ever writes a 20 page paper. Hell, I graduated from a well respected university with a non STEM degree a decade ago and still never had to write anything more than a few pages.
To be fair, the university had a very strict honor code and the amount of people that would try to plagiarize on longer writing assignments definitely led to pressure for professors to not assign essays as homework. Those were exclusively meant to be handwritten into blue books on exam day.
To be fair, the university had a very strict honor code and the amount of people that would try to plagiarize on longer writing assignments definitely led to pressure for professors to not assign essays as homework. Those were exclusively meant to be handwritten into blue books on exam day.
Having a lathe and a milling machine would be my dream. But I suspect the number of tinkerers has always remained constant. Properly understanding computers was always niche. Also, it’s impressive what you can achieve with the right combination of apps. I’m not saying you are, but it’s easy to paint the youth of today as moronic Ipad tappers, but if they can achieve what they want inside such an interface what does it really matter.
I admit the mill+lathe has probably always been a small crowd, but there definitely were a lot more "tinkerers" in the heyday of "Popular Mechanics" (and their entire press: "The Boy Mechanic", "Shop Notes", etc.).
If this is your bar then people have always been computer illiterate and it just looks different now. Using a PC any time after the launch of Windows XP is no different than a phone, the only “knowledge” people acquire are vendor specific trivia and metaphors.
For me, while having a lathe and milling machine would be neat (but messy), 3D printing fills that nitch for creating stuff.
Sort of orthogonal to the point that people are leaving off creating in favor of consuming. Even a lot of the 3D printing I see is basically someone "consuming" STL files others made and printing their own gaming figures.
Like it's more a way to save money than DIY (or perhaps there are STL figures that fill a niche that corporate Warhammer is not fulfilling?).
Like it's more a way to save money than DIY (or perhaps there are STL figures that fill a niche that corporate Warhammer is not fulfilling?).
I think this has been the case for a while. Performance plateaued pretty hard in the middle range spec hardware. Power consumption is getting better though.
Somebody gave me an ASUS laptop from a few years ago, probably about 2017. I wasn't expecting miracles, it was a Celeron N3350 (2016), but I wasn't expecting the i5-560 in the M4500 (2011) in the garage is about 2x as fast. Still shipped with an 5400RPM HDD as well.
The low end is still as garbage as it was in the past - barely a usable system at the time of purchase.
Somebody gave me an ASUS laptop from a few years ago, probably about 2017. I wasn't expecting miracles, it was a Celeron N3350 (2016), but I wasn't expecting the i5-560 in the M4500 (2011) in the garage is about 2x as fast. Still shipped with an 5400RPM HDD as well.
The low end is still as garbage as it was in the past - barely a usable system at the time of purchase.
I actually disagree. Middle range hardware is so much better than it was 5-6 years ago. I've built two computers recently around AMD Ryzen 5600 and that chip is so impressive. It runs circles around "high end" from the 5 years ago, and does it on stock cooling and 65W peak. (ex: https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i9-7960X-vs...)
And that's not low end. That's still a $500-$700 computer depending on what we're doing about gpu.
And I disagree that lowend is still garbage. I picked up a used business machine from Microcenter for $250 that had Windows, a multicore processor, 8GB ram and a SSD. I'm not quite sure what you want from an emailchecker and youtube watcher but the parents are very happy with it. Maybe that's a bad example but the bottom end feels better than ever for light use.
To me the real question mark is high end. $1000 processors? $2000 graphics cards? What in the world is happening?
And that's not low end. That's still a $500-$700 computer depending on what we're doing about gpu.
And I disagree that lowend is still garbage. I picked up a used business machine from Microcenter for $250 that had Windows, a multicore processor, 8GB ram and a SSD. I'm not quite sure what you want from an emailchecker and youtube watcher but the parents are very happy with it. Maybe that's a bad example but the bottom end feels better than ever for light use.
To me the real question mark is high end. $1000 processors? $2000 graphics cards? What in the world is happening?
A used business machine isn't "garbage tier". In general it's probably better than mid-tier. At least in build quality.
Real garbage tier barely has enough ram to run the OS. W11 officially requires 4 GB of RAM (which is insane), and you can find plenty of 4GB laptops on Amazon : https://www.amazon.com/Acer-A515-46-R3UB-Display-Quad-Core-P...
Now, that's shit tier (at least if you're running Windows.)
Real garbage tier barely has enough ram to run the OS. W11 officially requires 4 GB of RAM (which is insane), and you can find plenty of 4GB laptops on Amazon : https://www.amazon.com/Acer-A515-46-R3UB-Display-Quad-Core-P...
Now, that's shit tier (at least if you're running Windows.)
Honestly is that one really that bad? I get that 4Gb is offensive and I consider 8GB to be the minimum, but the reviews on that model are actually pretty universally positive. They say it actually has good performance on low-use tasks and has good battery life.
I'm watching a youtube video review of the exact model https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6GIE-bcSQg and even doing the 7 minute 4k video edit over ethernet in Adobe Premiere Pro, it stutters at full resolution but can handle basic tasks at 1/2 resolution.
Is this thing really shit?
I'm watching a youtube video review of the exact model https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6GIE-bcSQg and even doing the 7 minute 4k video edit over ethernet in Adobe Premiere Pro, it stutters at full resolution but can handle basic tasks at 1/2 resolution.
Is this thing really shit?
Interestingly, I didn't catch that this was running Windows S which only allows installing software from the windows store and running edge. That version apparently only requires 2GB of ram, so I guess that's why it runs fine.
I would consider something that only allows me to run stuff from the Microsoft store to be "garbage", but what do I know, it probably fits a lot of people's use case.
I would consider something that only allows me to run stuff from the Microsoft store to be "garbage", but what do I know, it probably fits a lot of people's use case.
It is definitely low end.
However, it is likely around double the CPU/GPU performance vs the older Celeron laptop I brought up, plus it has an NVMe. Not even the same tier in my mind.
If you could put another 4GB RAM in, it would probably be just fine for basic use. It might be an example of where budget machines "caught up" to software again.
However, it is likely around double the CPU/GPU performance vs the older Celeron laptop I brought up, plus it has an NVMe. Not even the same tier in my mind.
If you could put another 4GB RAM in, it would probably be just fine for basic use. It might be an example of where budget machines "caught up" to software again.
N3350 is from the Atom product line, which, IMO, is only suitable for embedded / thin clients. It does not tell much if an i7, even very dated, beats it.
I agree about what the CPU was good for, but I think the situation does tell us something.
The problem is that they were putting those in $300 and $400 Windows laptops and selling them to people who didn't know better at BestBuy. Shouldn't a new $400 laptop be able to open Outlook in less than a minute?
There used to be enough improvement over time where a budget chip would at least be comparable to a decent chip from a few years back. Now you're stuck comparing chips across most of a decade to see if performance is actually any better.
The problem is that they were putting those in $300 and $400 Windows laptops and selling them to people who didn't know better at BestBuy. Shouldn't a new $400 laptop be able to open Outlook in less than a minute?
There used to be enough improvement over time where a budget chip would at least be comparable to a decent chip from a few years back. Now you're stuck comparing chips across most of a decade to see if performance is actually any better.
Did they run the same OS? If the 2011 was using Windows XP, that that would be very unsurprising to me.
Yeah, I bought a $150 laptop from best buy with windows on it and the latest celeron and had to return it, it was literally unusable for anything, even emptying the recycle bin. I don't know how they get away with selling that stuff.
Outside of Gaming or maybe training AI models, there's really no reason to get a brand new PC. I recently bought a Dell Precision T1700, about 5 years old (EDIT: from 2013) for $199. Besides throwing in a better video card to run my 4k monitors, I haven't hit a point where I wished I had bought a better machine.
And that's the problem for Dell in the consumer space, going to best buy and picking up a new Dell is no longer the best deal, the best deals are all on used hardware that used to be 5-10x the price when new. Really the only consumers they appeal to are those that aren't technically savvy enough to buy a used computer online.
And that's the problem for Dell in the consumer space, going to best buy and picking up a new Dell is no longer the best deal, the best deals are all on used hardware that used to be 5-10x the price when new. Really the only consumers they appeal to are those that aren't technically savvy enough to buy a used computer online.
> I recently bought a Dell Precision T1700, about 5 years old (EDIT: from 2013) for $199. Besides throwing in a better video card to run my 4k monitors, I haven't hit a point where I wished I had bought a better machine.
IMO, the new Mac Mini is a pretty killer deal for that use case.
At $600, you get a modern CPU that:
* sips electricity
* is whisper quiet
* supports 2 4k monitors
* comes with a pretty good SSD
The price is pretty close to what you paid if you need to install a graphics card and an SSD (although to be fair you'd probably get a lot more capacity with a 3rd party device), and the modern CPU gives it a lot more longevity than a 10 year old machine.
Of course, a potential downside is that you have to run MacOS. But I've found that it isn't that bad.
IMO, the new Mac Mini is a pretty killer deal for that use case.
At $600, you get a modern CPU that:
* sips electricity
* is whisper quiet
* supports 2 4k monitors
* comes with a pretty good SSD
The price is pretty close to what you paid if you need to install a graphics card and an SSD (although to be fair you'd probably get a lot more capacity with a 3rd party device), and the modern CPU gives it a lot more longevity than a 10 year old machine.
Of course, a potential downside is that you have to run MacOS. But I've found that it isn't that bad.
macOS is pretty bad, IMO, coming from Windows or Linux, but the biggest problem with Apple hardware is the total lack of extensibility coupled with the highway robbery prices of extra RAM/SSD. You're either paying massive premiums or taking the risk that the machine will have insufficient RAM or storage and would need to be replaced sooner rather than later (compared to any random PC or even most laptops where upgrading the RAM or SSD to prolong the life is east).
> the biggest problem with Apple hardware is the total lack of extensibility coupled with the highway robbery prices of extra RAM/SSD. You're either paying massive premiums or taking the risk that the machine will have insufficient RAM or storage and would need to be replaced sooner rather than later
IMO, it's not nearly as big of a deal to use an external drive with a mac. But the ram thing - for sure. 8 GB seems like it should be pretty limiting.
In practice I don't find 8 GB to be very limiting - I think probably because the SSD is so fast and makes up for it. I suppose no one knows what the future has in store.
To be fair, I don't tend to run a lot of electron based apps, so I probably have less memory pressure than many people.
IMO, it's not nearly as big of a deal to use an external drive with a mac. But the ram thing - for sure. 8 GB seems like it should be pretty limiting.
In practice I don't find 8 GB to be very limiting - I think probably because the SSD is so fast and makes up for it. I suppose no one knows what the future has in store.
To be fair, I don't tend to run a lot of electron based apps, so I probably have less memory pressure than many people.
Yeah I considered it, and TBH I might end up getting one at some point. Personally for me I just needed the cheapest thing that would get the job done (JS programming). And as far as electricity consumption, that's just something that wasn't on my radar.
> Really the only consumers they appeal to are those that aren't technically savvy enough to buy a used computer online.
Funny, people said something similar decades ago but it was more like "the only consumers they appeal to are those that aren't technically savvy enough to build their own."
Funny, people said something similar decades ago but it was more like "the only consumers they appeal to are those that aren't technically savvy enough to build their own."
Wanting to use my 4K monitor rules out many old laptops. Desktops can be fixed with that video card, but not a laptop.
I've run a 4k monitor and a 1080 monitor simultaneously on a 7 year old Thinkpad P50 (m1000m gpu; wasn't anything to write home about when it was new) for years. I think you'll be fine with an old laptop.
I've run a 4k off an x220. It had to run at 30Hz, but it otherwise worked way better than I expected (which was not at all).
Maybe an external video card will work? But to really utilize that it would require a laptop with a Thunderbolt port which is out of the question for most old laptops.
I wonder if you'd have been better off in the long run with a new CPU due to energy usage. Especially if you're not gaming and don't really need a discrete video card.
I have a more modern work laptop, but my main desktop is a Haswell 4790 (almost 9 years old, happens to be a Dell 9020) with an SSD and RAM upgrade. Is it amazing? Not really, but it's perfectly usable for most tasks, including Fusion360, 3D printer slicing, light dev work, video conferencing, etc and will drive 2 4K monitors.
I bought two more for my kids at the start of COVID ($75 ea plus a $75 SSD); they're perfectly usable for all educational purposes, YouTube, light coding, and light gaming (Minecraft and the like) and way better than whatever $250-350 will buy at the low end of the new machine market.
I bought two more for my kids at the start of COVID ($75 ea plus a $75 SSD); they're perfectly usable for all educational purposes, YouTube, light coding, and light gaming (Minecraft and the like) and way better than whatever $250-350 will buy at the low end of the new machine market.
Yeah, I have a newish Apple Silicon MacBook Pro that I use for multimedia/generative AI/etc. stuff. But my other MacBook and iMac are 2015-era and they're just fine for web browsing, video conferencing, and so forth. They don't even support the latest OS version but they're just fine to use--which certainly wouldn't have been true 10 or 15 years ago.
I have a 3770 Ivy Bridge (a refurb'd HP Elite 8300 with SSD upgrade and 32GM RAM). Genuinely for the work I've done with it, C/C++, Rust, JS and Python, which I'd consider that heavy dev work, media consumption on a 2K monitor, with a Nvidia GT1030, some 3D gaming (on low-medium setting) it's competitive with my work MacBook Pro M1 (although that only has 8GB RAM).
Is there a site that collects something like "hidden gems" of the used PC market? I know nothing about PCs (Apple guy) but I think I would enjoy getting cheap PCs from eBay. (I'd like to make a cheap entry-level gaming machine for my dad who is even less PC-literate than me and has an even tighter budget.)
I did check eBay for 8300's and saw there is quite a family of machines — some taking at least half0height graphics cards (for which I saw some used Radeon R5s on eBay going for $30 or so).
I did check eBay for 8300's and saw there is quite a family of machines — some taking at least half0height graphics cards (for which I saw some used Radeon R5s on eBay going for $30 or so).
I don't know if there's a site focused on that (would seem like a lot of work for little payoff), but I can vouch that most office mid-sized towers will take a graphics card and most will have excellent cooling. For the Dell 9020, you need a power supply adapter ($14 on Amazon, $4 on Aliexpress; the motherboard takes a custom connector) and a replacement ATX power supply if you want to use a high power GPU. (For other motherboards that have a standard 20+4 ATX connector, you still might need a replacement PSU, but won't need the additional adapter cable.)
I've found Craigslist and FB Marketplace to be a better source, since shipping is a killer (but I'm in easy driving distance of Boston; if you're far away from a major office city, that might not work as well).
The i7-4790 Dell 9020 can't do TPM 2.0, so a few games will be locked out by anti-cheat mechanisms, but you can drop an 6650 XT or RX480/580 or cheap nVidia card into one and play the Minecraft/Fortnite/Rocket League and other light/medium games just fine, especially at only 1080p.
I probably wouldn't bother with a half-height R5. The Intel HD 630 iGPU will outperform an R5 and the Intel 4600 iGPU is 2/3 the performance of an R5 430. if you're out shopping for something new (to you) to buy, I think you can buy a computer with a better iGPU rather than buy a lesser CPU and add an R5. (If you can swing it, I'd probably target at least 8th gen CPUs at this point. Or target 4th gen if significantly cheaper in your area and plan to upgrade 3-4 years from now.)
I've found Craigslist and FB Marketplace to be a better source, since shipping is a killer (but I'm in easy driving distance of Boston; if you're far away from a major office city, that might not work as well).
The i7-4790 Dell 9020 can't do TPM 2.0, so a few games will be locked out by anti-cheat mechanisms, but you can drop an 6650 XT or RX480/580 or cheap nVidia card into one and play the Minecraft/Fortnite/Rocket League and other light/medium games just fine, especially at only 1080p.
I probably wouldn't bother with a half-height R5. The Intel HD 630 iGPU will outperform an R5 and the Intel 4600 iGPU is 2/3 the performance of an R5 430. if you're out shopping for something new (to you) to buy, I think you can buy a computer with a better iGPU rather than buy a lesser CPU and add an R5. (If you can swing it, I'd probably target at least 8th gen CPUs at this point. Or target 4th gen if significantly cheaper in your area and plan to upgrade 3-4 years from now.)
Not for gaming but SFF PCs for home server https://www.servethehome.com/introducing-project-tinyminimic...
PCs aren’t getting better, but software is getting worse so you do need more CPU/RAM just to run the latest Electron monstrosities
> PCs arent getting any better. We have pushed our replacement schedule out to at least 5 years now.
They certainly are getting better, but the pace of improvement isn't very fast. There's not much need to replace a 5 year old computer, but for the most part, the replacement will be better or cheaper or both. If you were already buying low end machines, there's not really room for price improvement though, just a better performance floor.
Intel is still coming out of their pipeline stall, but if they get a couple years of consistent product delivery, we may have a competitive market again.
They certainly are getting better, but the pace of improvement isn't very fast. There's not much need to replace a 5 year old computer, but for the most part, the replacement will be better or cheaper or both. If you were already buying low end machines, there's not really room for price improvement though, just a better performance floor.
Intel is still coming out of their pipeline stall, but if they get a couple years of consistent product delivery, we may have a competitive market again.
I still use my old laptops (12 - 5 years), only work laptops get replaced as per company policies.
There is hardly anything that I need, although I prefer native 3D APIs it isn't as if my hobby coding skills need to match AAA ray tracing hardware, 3D Web APIs due to their hardware baselines work just fine (one of them is modern enough for WebGPU), same applies to compute coding.
Also with the way Microsoft burned everyone that actually believed into WinRT, I lost any interest into updating to Windows 11.
Same applies to smartphones, if they aren't broken or lost, I am not getting new ones.
There is hardly anything that I need, although I prefer native 3D APIs it isn't as if my hobby coding skills need to match AAA ray tracing hardware, 3D Web APIs due to their hardware baselines work just fine (one of them is modern enough for WebGPU), same applies to compute coding.
Also with the way Microsoft burned everyone that actually believed into WinRT, I lost any interest into updating to Windows 11.
Same applies to smartphones, if they aren't broken or lost, I am not getting new ones.
Even PCs that are nearly 10 years old can still keep going when you add more RAM and use an SSD. We’ve done that for work computers for non-devs and it’s been going great.
I've had three XPS's in the past few years, one of them the mouse didn't work out the box, the second one started having fan issues after one year, and this current one just freezes randomly for no reason.
It sucks because Dell used to be awesome. My dad is still using a 10 year old XPS.
It sucks because Dell used to be awesome. My dad is still using a 10 year old XPS.
We get issued Dells at work - I've been there five years and had to send back 4 machines for various issues ranging from persistent BSODs, intermitten freezes to GPU problems. I currently have an I7 / 64gb XPS workstation and it's noticably slower than my personal MBA M1....
The grass isn’t much greener. I’ve gone through a number of Lenovo X1s.
HP still sucks, too
This is what finally drove me to switch to mac. Had three XPSs which were all defective *on arrival* (two with defective touch pad, one with a defective display cable). After sending the third one back I bought a macbook pro and have used them ever since.
I don't doubt that everyone else in this thread has had reliability problems.
But as a counterpoint, I'm on my third xps13 laptop and all three have worked really well. Maybe I just got lucky.
Only hour ago I was looking at the specs of a xps 13 to replace a low-end Latitude 5280 from 2017 only to find that its connectivity to the outside world is horrible/totally inadequate. The old Latitude 5280 is far better equipped.
There's no USB-A let alone a 15-pin VGA socket that I use regularly. To quote part of the spec:
'USB-C to USB-A 3.0 adapter (included in the box) USB-C to 3.5mm headset adapter (included in the box)'
How the hell do you actually use it? You can't even plug in a standard USB-A thumb drive without an adapter—an item that's easily lost when traveling about. Same goes for the 3.5mm audio connector. Has Apple planted a Trojan horse inside Dell? It seems like it.
This has to be some kind of joke. If Dell thinks it can sell laptops that aren't very flexible to use—especially high end models—then it's little wonder people aren't buying them.
What's gone wrong with these PC companies that they are so far behind? For instance, it's only now that OLED screens have hit the laptop market and only then on high end devices—that's years after TVs and smartphones had them.
If companies like Dell don't supply us with what we want then we'll go elsewhere.
There's no USB-A let alone a 15-pin VGA socket that I use regularly. To quote part of the spec:
'USB-C to USB-A 3.0 adapter (included in the box) USB-C to 3.5mm headset adapter (included in the box)'
How the hell do you actually use it? You can't even plug in a standard USB-A thumb drive without an adapter—an item that's easily lost when traveling about. Same goes for the 3.5mm audio connector. Has Apple planted a Trojan horse inside Dell? It seems like it.
This has to be some kind of joke. If Dell thinks it can sell laptops that aren't very flexible to use—especially high end models—then it's little wonder people aren't buying them.
What's gone wrong with these PC companies that they are so far behind? For instance, it's only now that OLED screens have hit the laptop market and only then on high end devices—that's years after TVs and smartphones had them.
If companies like Dell don't supply us with what we want then we'll go elsewhere.
Are there any current generation computers that come with VGA these days, other than servers?
HDMI seems to be the right choice there, maybe for the last 5-10 years. Display port might be better, but HDMI has ubiquity.
I'm with you on usb-a and headphone jacks. I hear usb-c is the future, but afaik, mice and keyboards are still mostly usb-a or wireless (which I don't want)
HDMI seems to be the right choice there, maybe for the last 5-10 years. Display port might be better, but HDMI has ubiquity.
I'm with you on usb-a and headphone jacks. I hear usb-c is the future, but afaik, mice and keyboards are still mostly usb-a or wireless (which I don't want)
Japanese brands still sell latest laptop with ancient port https://panasonic.jp/cns/pc/products/fv3j/spec.html#interfac... https://kakaku.com/pc/note-pc/itemlist.aspx?pdf_Spec047=1&pd...
That's handy to know, I wonder if they're easily obtainable outside Japan.
(I've been thinking for a while it's time I paid another visit to Akihabara, that's almost a perfect excuse.) :-)
(I've been thinking for a while it's time I paid another visit to Akihabara, that's almost a perfect excuse.) :-)
> a 15-pin VGA socket that I use regularly
I'm very relieved that the XPS13 series does not include a VGA header. That would have been a huge design error on their part. This particular need of yours does not match the market need.
> There's no USB-A ... 'USB-C to USB-A 3.0 adapter (included in the box)
I will agree that this is occasionally inconvenient. I don't have as many USB-A devices anymore but when I need to plug one in, it's a bummer to have to go get the dongle. I suppose there may be challenges finding room for a USB-A port while trying to make the device thin and tapered.
> Has Apple planted a Trojan horse inside Dell? It seems like it.
I don't think it's a trojan horse -- but Dell has followed Apple's lead here in ditching USB-A.
I'm very relieved that the XPS13 series does not include a VGA header. That would have been a huge design error on their part. This particular need of yours does not match the market need.
> There's no USB-A ... 'USB-C to USB-A 3.0 adapter (included in the box)
I will agree that this is occasionally inconvenient. I don't have as many USB-A devices anymore but when I need to plug one in, it's a bummer to have to go get the dongle. I suppose there may be challenges finding room for a USB-A port while trying to make the device thin and tapered.
> Has Apple planted a Trojan horse inside Dell? It seems like it.
I don't think it's a trojan horse -- but Dell has followed Apple's lead here in ditching USB-A.
"That would have been a huge design error on their part. This particular need of yours does not match the market need."
The fact is that header is used regularly by many people, especially those who do presentations/use overhead projectors. Moreover, it's been a part of every other Dell laptop I've owned and that's been quite a few.
That's the trouble with this industry—fashion and saving a few bucks by not installing headers in preference to longevity and compatibility. Many of us are tired of that and this planned obsolescence is contributing to e-waste. Dell has a responsibility here.
Dell could have done both but they chose not to. Now we're marching on mass elsewhere.
I can't understand why you and Dell don't get that.
BTW, I've dozens of USB-A thumb drives and it's almost impossible to buy USB-C ones or the dual type where I live (I search everywhere for them because I want them for my smartphone's OTG). As much as I'd like USB-A to disappear it's everywhere and there's no sign of it dying especially on chargers (and I use laptops to charge everything including my smartphone). You must have limited needs and also be very organized to avoid them. Most of us aren't that lucky.
If Dell doesn't understand the market where I live then tough. For starters it's lost me a longstanding customer, and as an IT professional I recommended equipment. Right, Dell's foolhardiness has flow-on implications. From this story it seems that I'm not alone.
The fact is that header is used regularly by many people, especially those who do presentations/use overhead projectors. Moreover, it's been a part of every other Dell laptop I've owned and that's been quite a few.
That's the trouble with this industry—fashion and saving a few bucks by not installing headers in preference to longevity and compatibility. Many of us are tired of that and this planned obsolescence is contributing to e-waste. Dell has a responsibility here.
Dell could have done both but they chose not to. Now we're marching on mass elsewhere.
I can't understand why you and Dell don't get that.
BTW, I've dozens of USB-A thumb drives and it's almost impossible to buy USB-C ones or the dual type where I live (I search everywhere for them because I want them for my smartphone's OTG). As much as I'd like USB-A to disappear it's everywhere and there's no sign of it dying especially on chargers (and I use laptops to charge everything including my smartphone). You must have limited needs and also be very organized to avoid them. Most of us aren't that lucky.
If Dell doesn't understand the market where I live then tough. For starters it's lost me a longstanding customer, and as an IT professional I recommended equipment. Right, Dell's foolhardiness has flow-on implications. From this story it seems that I'm not alone.
I have an xps 15 and it's works great with KDE Neon.
I usually go for Lattitudes when I'm buying, but this is what the company sent me.
I usually go for Lattitudes when I'm buying, but this is what the company sent me.
Apple took the high end, pushing all other PC makers down market.
Gamers are an exception but hard core gamers often do their own builds or go with gaming brands.
Gamers are an exception but hard core gamers often do their own builds or go with gaming brands.
The first civilian Dell I ever bought, maybe 12 years ago, was dead on arrival. Wouldn’t even attempt to post.
That being said I’ve had 4-5 of their Poweredge servers and like/trust Dell’s enterprise gear a lot.
That being said I’ve had 4-5 of their Poweredge servers and like/trust Dell’s enterprise gear a lot.
I got in a shipment of 10 Dell Latitude laptops for work recently. Every. Single. One. had to be shipped back for repair due to video issues within the first week of being deployed.
I have an XPS 15 with thermal and sleep issues. Does anyone make a decent windows laptop?
I'm hoping my current one will last until asahi linux is more usable and then I'll buy an M1 mac.
I'm hoping my current one will last until asahi linux is more usable and then I'll buy an M1 mac.
> Does anyone make a decent windows laptop?
Asus - they have lots of product lines to choose from, from cheap (and therefore not great) to gems such as the ROG Zephyrus line. I have an old UX303 that is still going strong after 7 years of use, a just updated to a ROG Zephyrus G14 2022, and i really like it. Similar dimensions (slightly thicker) and weight to my work issued M1 MBP, works flawlessly and is a pretty good gaming machine (of course being loud in the process, but silent for everything else).
Asus - they have lots of product lines to choose from, from cheap (and therefore not great) to gems such as the ROG Zephyrus line. I have an old UX303 that is still going strong after 7 years of use, a just updated to a ROG Zephyrus G14 2022, and i really like it. Similar dimensions (slightly thicker) and weight to my work issued M1 MBP, works flawlessly and is a pretty good gaming machine (of course being loud in the process, but silent for everything else).
"Does anyone make a decent windows laptop?"
I doubt it, I've been looking for ages and they all have stupid limitations that could be easily fixed such as insufficient ports—see my earlier reply to wyldfire.
When or if you find one then please let us know.
I doubt it, I've been looking for ages and they all have stupid limitations that could be easily fixed such as insufficient ports—see my earlier reply to wyldfire.
When or if you find one then please let us know.
I'm in love with my LG gram 17. It has a 17 inch screen and weighs less than 3lbs. You can configure the 2023 model with a RTX 3050 too.
Our IT guys called them eXtreme Pieces of Sh*t. I had a 9360 a few years ago and it lived up to their nickname.
> Following a surge in PC sales during the global covid pandemic, most major computing manufacturers are now seeing a sharp drop in demand.
I'd expect. Most of those PCs are still working and are powerful enough to handle typical demands for several more years. They should have predicted this.
I'd expect. Most of those PCs are still working and are powerful enough to handle typical demands for several more years. They should have predicted this.
What makes you think they didn’t predict this?
Corel (if you’re old enough to remember Corel Draw) had a bit of a name for hiring a ton of new employees when a project was starting or needed headcount, and then laying them all off when they pushed out a major release.
Corel (if you’re old enough to remember Corel Draw) had a bit of a name for hiring a ton of new employees when a project was starting or needed headcount, and then laying them all off when they pushed out a major release.
I find it hard to believe that most of the justifications that these companies are using for layoffs weren't blatantly obvious.
They've increased headcount when times were good, and reduced it when that demand recedes. What would they do differently if they had a 100% accurate forecast?
I believe an argument could be made that some of these companies knowingly went overboard on the headcount increase. In the end, sometimes it is just the cost of business. Layoffs are common in the trades and come along with increased compensation that is often designed to help cover those layoff periods (see Davis Bacon Wage Act). My point being more in the direction of these layoff justifications seem disingenuous if not flat out lies.
But are layoffs bad ? Did we expect them to be very slow following the trend up and very slow down so that they smooth the workforce, or did we want them to fullfill the demande NOW when we needed pcs during covid and... expect them not to fire now that we dont care anymore ?
> But are layoffs bad ?
It depends on what side of the layoff you are on and how these positions were signaled. It is what it is - I just think that these things should be considered by all employees in the future when jumps in market demand happen - especially all of these companies participating in mass layoffs.
What I don't particularly like is how companies will signal that the massive rise in business is because they're such a great company and are doing so well. Then they'll turn around and shit-can thousands overnight with justification that it was an unforeseen market shift that they could've never prepared for.
I loved working in the trades, but couldn't weather that frequent storm that had evolved to become the norm. I'd hate to see that become the norm in tech. Not to mention what high supply / low demand does for wages.
It depends on what side of the layoff you are on and how these positions were signaled. It is what it is - I just think that these things should be considered by all employees in the future when jumps in market demand happen - especially all of these companies participating in mass layoffs.
What I don't particularly like is how companies will signal that the massive rise in business is because they're such a great company and are doing so well. Then they'll turn around and shit-can thousands overnight with justification that it was an unforeseen market shift that they could've never prepared for.
I loved working in the trades, but couldn't weather that frequent storm that had evolved to become the norm. I'd hate to see that become the norm in tech. Not to mention what high supply / low demand does for wages.
Dell lost my confidence when their XPS 15 display couldn't display a pane of gray without flickering. I switched to a Macbook Pro and haven't looked back.
For me (personally) to consider Dell again, they would have to replicate everything that Framework does and ship Linux with support.
Edit: can I also add that they suck for business too? The slim form factor has NO place in business, slimming down the chassis and removing ports is an anti-pattern. I couldn't give a shit how thin my work laptop looks, my job doesn't involve taking pictures of unrealistically minimalistic office desks. With Dell you either get a dainty oversized netbook or a rugged behemoth (which is a little too rugged unless you're in telecom and roll in a van). Where's the middle ground? Nothing needed to change from the old thinkpad.
For me (personally) to consider Dell again, they would have to replicate everything that Framework does and ship Linux with support.
Edit: can I also add that they suck for business too? The slim form factor has NO place in business, slimming down the chassis and removing ports is an anti-pattern. I couldn't give a shit how thin my work laptop looks, my job doesn't involve taking pictures of unrealistically minimalistic office desks. With Dell you either get a dainty oversized netbook or a rugged behemoth (which is a little too rugged unless you're in telecom and roll in a van). Where's the middle ground? Nothing needed to change from the old thinkpad.
> The slim form factor has NO place in business.
It's arguably the most important attribute for quite a significant chunk of the business world. Work laptops need to be transported at least twice a day and most business tasks aren't at all demanding.
My dad's work mandates that he has to replace his laptop at most every 3 years and he has always picked the lightest macbook Apple sells. For a long time, it was the 11" Macbook Air and then it was the much derided 12" Macbook with a single port which he loved. Now, he's on the extremely well reviewed 13" M1 MBA and it's the least favorite of all the macbooks he's ever owned and he keeps asking me if this is really the smallest laptop in Apple's lineup and to let him know when Apple launches a smaller one so he can switch immediately.
It's arguably the most important attribute for quite a significant chunk of the business world. Work laptops need to be transported at least twice a day and most business tasks aren't at all demanding.
My dad's work mandates that he has to replace his laptop at most every 3 years and he has always picked the lightest macbook Apple sells. For a long time, it was the 11" Macbook Air and then it was the much derided 12" Macbook with a single port which he loved. Now, he's on the extremely well reviewed 13" M1 MBA and it's the least favorite of all the macbooks he's ever owned and he keeps asking me if this is really the smallest laptop in Apple's lineup and to let him know when Apple launches a smaller one so he can switch immediately.
> can I also add that they suck for business too? The slim form factor has NO place in business, slimming down the chassis and removing ports is an anti-pattern
Define "business"? A salesperson that frequently travels to customers needs a thin laptop more than they need a powerful one. The opposite is true for a developer that would need more power but doesn't require the best GPU and screen, which a design person probably does. Dell offer all sorts of laptops fitting each of those use cases (unlike say Apple where e.g. the screen is non-negotiable).
Define "business"? A salesperson that frequently travels to customers needs a thin laptop more than they need a powerful one. The opposite is true for a developer that would need more power but doesn't require the best GPU and screen, which a design person probably does. Dell offer all sorts of laptops fitting each of those use cases (unlike say Apple where e.g. the screen is non-negotiable).
Dell's Precision Mobile Workstations are beasts. I have a 7750, whacked 128GB RAM into it aftermarket, and never looked back.
I can confirm - I have a Precision 7670 in pretty much the top spec(i7-12850HX, 128GB ram, 3080Ti) and it's an absolute beast. It blows my previous HP Z5 workstation desktop out of the water, it improved my compilation times by half. Really made my work more productive thanks to the crazy spec.
I do notice the HP workstation tier laptops have absolutely trash thermals.
You can't do anything remotely intensive for longer than 15-30 seconds before the thing thermal throttles and becomes a hot paperweight.
You can't do anything remotely intensive for longer than 15-30 seconds before the thing thermal throttles and becomes a hot paperweight.
Replace the thermal paste, or use liquid metal if your heatsink allows
The thinness and lack of ports on the Precision doesn't bother you?
You must be thinking of a different line of laptops - the Precision workstations are anything but thin. They are big and pretty heavy laptops with plenty of ports.
XPS are the ones with no ports. The Precision and Lattitude lines usually have enough ports, and come in a variety of thin/thick models.
Does this mean I can finally get a high end computer for a decent price? I was in the market for one shortly after the pandemic started, but decided to delay because of the ridiculous prices and shipping times.
If u want a desktop pc buy one second hand, their components can often run perfectly for literally decades. But for some reason they still devalue like crazy when 2nd hand. You pay a fraction of the retail price for 2nd hand pcs. I've bought 3 gaming pcs recently for about €300 each. Just the gpu in one of them would have cost €400 new. I've built my own pcs in the past with all brand new components, but now I am planning to never buy new components again.
[deleted]
I do this often and have several second hand machines in my house. However, for the production machine that I use on a daily basis, I prefer buying it new with next day warranty service.
I'd love to see a list PC's that make good 2nd hand machines — ones I assume that can be upgraded (graphic cards esp. of course).
Imo anything except stuff from giant pc-makers like dell who have their own weird proprietary cases and mobos and whatnot.
Any normal IBM clone pc is gonna be fully moddable / upgradable. For example if u wanted to check if u could put a new bigger GPU in, the main thing is just check if the mobo has big enough pcie slot for the card (x2, x4, x8, etc.) and also check if the PSU can provide enough wattage (If theres already a big GPU in it then its probably fine, newer GPUs tend to perform better without using anymore watts)
I just go on 2nd hand sites like adverts.ie (I guess in USA maybe craigslist is similar?) and search for "gaming pc".
There is definitely a learning curve to choosing new components to swap in. But if u just buy a 2nd hand gaming pc that can already play games then u cant go wrong, no upgrades necessary.
Any normal IBM clone pc is gonna be fully moddable / upgradable. For example if u wanted to check if u could put a new bigger GPU in, the main thing is just check if the mobo has big enough pcie slot for the card (x2, x4, x8, etc.) and also check if the PSU can provide enough wattage (If theres already a big GPU in it then its probably fine, newer GPUs tend to perform better without using anymore watts)
I just go on 2nd hand sites like adverts.ie (I guess in USA maybe craigslist is similar?) and search for "gaming pc".
There is definitely a learning curve to choosing new components to swap in. But if u just buy a 2nd hand gaming pc that can already play games then u cant go wrong, no upgrades necessary.
Unlike cars, I don't think devalue on PC parts is primary due to 2nd handed. It's just because new model is available.
It's better than it was at the worst of the pandemic, and the used market has cooled off a lot. At this point you're into regular market timing questions.
If you compare current laptop offers with a Core i5-1235U and Windows 10/11 Pro, you'll see that at least HP and Lenovo give you significantly more bang for the buck than Dell.
Well, Lenovo is also doing layoffs.
https://wraltechwire.com/2022/12/09/blindsided-lenovo-confir...
https://wraltechwire.com/2022/12/09/blindsided-lenovo-confir...
And HP announced it in November: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/11/22/hp-laying-off-4000-6000-empl...
My main grief with Dell is that they still practice inflating catalog prices of their business SKU to allow their B2B salespeople to grant "outstanding" discounts. They aren't the only ones doing that (I'm looking e.g. at Fujitsu) but at least Lenovo and HP offer business laptops at competitive prices without having to deal with a pushy salesperson.
My main grief with Dell is that they still practice inflating catalog prices of their business SKU to allow their B2B salespeople to grant "outstanding" discounts. They aren't the only ones doing that (I'm looking e.g. at Fujitsu) but at least Lenovo and HP offer business laptops at competitive prices without having to deal with a pushy salesperson.
I've moved away from Dell laptops due to a noticeable drop in build quality for their XPS/personal laptop line. Dells are good for businesses that can pay for support plans at scale, but I wouldn't trust it Dell for a personal machine (I've had a battery swell up, broken keyboard, broken hinge and power button, dead pixels, and a display die just from 3 laptops). But your mileage may vary.
I find the Dell website frustrating, many times I would click on a laptop ad only to find a 'temporarily out of stock', message.
The Dell site was so hot garbage a few years ago that I often times gave up browsing it and went to BestBuy to see what Dell offers.
Last year I checked it again and I saw they made great progress. Not quite Apple-style yet but a good step forward.
I hope they trim their product line a little more and start producing better hardware. I find their design the most appealing among non-Apple devices.
Last year I checked it again and I saw they made great progress. Not quite Apple-style yet but a good step forward.
I hope they trim their product line a little more and start producing better hardware. I find their design the most appealing among non-Apple devices.
Only if they started fixing their hardware issues...
This.. my 5 year old dell laptop had so much issues, I though they got their shit together but the dell laptop I got this year for work had issues too.
I myself moved to an apple arm laptop which is 100x better.
I myself moved to an apple arm laptop which is 100x better.
Luckily I don't have any problems with my current Dell except overheating but that's a common issue, but after seeing all the problems with the XPS 12/15, Inspiron Plus 16, etc, I don't think I'll buy anything from them again.
i can only attest on personal experience, but yes...
We can't get customers to replace equipment. Businesses appear to be intending to run everything into the ground and expect us to just keep fixing stuff forever. We're considering an emergency billing rate, when a customer has a predictable failure we've warned them about. Meanwhile, any project that requires new hardware might as well be abandoned.
Dell thinks it's bad now? It's only getting worse.
Dell thinks it's bad now? It's only getting worse.
Today's smartphones are very capable devices. I do most coding web based (code-server) on my S22 Ultra using Samsung DeX and an external monitor. My phone has more RAM than the average laptop. There just isn't any need for me to buy a new laptop or PC.
Something tells me this is companies cutting BS jobs that were created to subsidize college grads. Just made up jobs and fake growth to fluff numbers and make investors happy.
5% global layoffs, plummets seems like a exageration but we will see
Dell definitely seem to be suffering more than their competitors, with a 37% decline vs 28% average (though Apple will be skewing the figures somewhat with only a 2% decline).
https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS50031623
https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS50031623
If you exclude Dell and Apple, the others average -27.35%. So basically Dell and Apple are the two outliers here.
Demand for PCs is plummeting, not staffing levels.
37 percent decline in PC shipments in Q4, 2022 compared to the previous year.
Despite the significant downturn, shipping is close to the same numbers reported in 2019, before the effects of COVID.
Q4 2021 was ~60% more units shipped than Q4 2019, this is a reversion to the mean.
Q4 2021 was ~60% more units shipped than Q4 2019, this is a reversion to the mean.
[deleted]