[untitled]
8 comments
[deleted]
as tho society was better 50-100 years when it came towards women and sexual orientation compared to today? yeah nice try.
Easy access to vices is how we are placating a working class devoid of economic opportunities.
Id like to point out submitter, binning, has no comments and no favorites. Only a string of sexually conservative submissions with very low karma.
I submit that this user is not a hacker, nor has no intention of being part of the hacker community. They are clearly just using this resource as an outlet for their propaganda and it's not resonating with this community.
I submit that this user is not a hacker, nor has no intention of being part of the hacker community. They are clearly just using this resource as an outlet for their propaganda and it's not resonating with this community.
Even the headline is illogical. Even if the writer's premise is correct, and "porn" (which porn? It's not one homogenous mass) is getting more extreme, why is it "degrading society?" The real subtext is "porn is bad."
Started off ok, but revealed themselves when talking abt trans like this:
>The bodies featured in porn are parodies of nature: women with enormous breast and butt implants; male “chicks with dicks”. A taste for sissy porn, in which men are degraded by being forcibly feminised, is central to many trans-identifying men’s belief that they are really women.
And egads: >trans-identifying male journalist Andrea Long Chu,
Ouch! This is just another "porn is extreme" panic with no insight.
>The bodies featured in porn are parodies of nature: women with enormous breast and butt implants; male “chicks with dicks”. A taste for sissy porn, in which men are degraded by being forcibly feminised, is central to many trans-identifying men’s belief that they are really women.
And egads: >trans-identifying male journalist Andrea Long Chu,
Ouch! This is just another "porn is extreme" panic with no insight.
[deleted]
Imagine how news degrades society.