This is a general NLP problem. People use language in more complicated ways than direct literal encoding. In the general case, it's a very hard problem, but hate specifically may not be so difficult.
People tend not to use phrases like "kill all the" in unambiguous ways.
My friend said that pressure cooking popcorn kernels as an incubation medium allowed fast mycillial colonization. He could shake the jars every couple days to speed up the process. He also claimed pasteurized hay made an excellent growth substrate.
Well... The traveling salesman decision problem, not the general case.
The problem of finding the optimum path is not in NP, if I give you a candidate solution you can't easily check if it's the global optimum.
What is in NP is the decision problem, finding a path that is better than a given bound. If I hand you a candidate solution, you just have to compare the sum of the distances to the bound to check it.
Someone must have the most likes. But it's true for the rest of us. If there are disconnected graphs, they'll have a local king of the popularity hill.
Most gasoline engines are homegenous charge, and run within a few percent of the stoichiometric air fuel ratio. Diesels will run at 6x the stoichiometric ideal amount of air.
While we all learned in middle school geometric algebra that the even subalgebra of G3 is isomorphic to the quaternions, what is the relationship between the even subalgebra of G4 and the octonions?
If you write out a multiplication table, it seems that it's isomorphic.
But... Octonions aren't associtive. Does the even subalgebra of G4 somehow lose associativity? Is it equivalent to Octonions with a cannonical multiplication order?