HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

alfongj

no profile record

Submissions

Kremlin spied on activist's Telegram chats

wired.com
2 points·by alfongj·hace 3 años·0 comments

ComposeJS – a whole backend inside react

github.com
2 points·by alfongj·hace 5 años·0 comments

Bringing child drawings to life with AI

ai.facebook.com
1 points·by alfongj·hace 5 años·1 comments

We're not prepared for the next solar superstorm

independent.co.uk
8 points·by alfongj·hace 5 años·0 comments

comments

alfongj
·hace 4 años·discuss
> Say what you want about their security; they have the absolute best UX of any (primarily 1-on-1) messaging app, bar none.

> Discord is a close second. But the quality and polish of telegram blows me away to this day.

User experience is, well, subjective to the user. For tech savvy, primarily desktop users, Telegram and Discord can be great choices.

This is however probably not true for the majority of the population.
alfongj
·hace 4 años·discuss
WhatsApp got there faster with no ads either
alfongj
·hace 4 años·discuss
Narrative violation
alfongj
·hace 5 años·discuss
There's so many possible confounding effects that it's hard to take this at face value.
alfongj
·hace 5 años·discuss
This is the right answer. Matching user data without consent is becoming fairly risky from a data regulation standpoint, as well as user perception.
alfongj
·hace 5 años·discuss
Right, but that doesn't compromise the security of the service necessarily.

Users can catch a malicious server injecting incorrect keys by looking at security notifications and comparing security codes. This is part of the Signal protocol.

This may be tedious but only needs to be done in the event of phone keys getting reset (a once in a year event?), as all companion device keys are automatically verified with signatures provided from an account owner's primary (phone) device

Source: https://www.whatsapp.com/security/WhatsApp_Security_Whitepap...
alfongj
·hace 5 años·discuss
What's your concern?