I honestly don't know why advertisers care where their advertisements appear. If they all just disclaimed any control over the associations with their advertising nobody would care. Nobody associates the ads with the video content, nobody.
You're just plain wrong, mate. Anyone can ask a question. You just can't ask the same question that's been answered before or a question that is blatantly off topic.
In the Witcher 3 you are playing a specific character created by the developers. It's a bit like a JRPG in that sense. Most western RPGs have you play as your own character.
>This overload means it now makes little sense to ask for the ‘chronological feed’ back. If you have 1,500 or 3,000 items a day, then the chronological feed is actually just the items you can be bothered to scroll through before giving up, which can only be 10% or 20% of what’s actually there. This will be sorted by no logical order at all except whether your friends happened to post them within the last hour. It’s not so much chronological in any useful sense as a random sample, where the randomizer is simply whatever time you yourself happen to open the app. ’What did any of the 300 people that I friended in the last 5 years post between 16:32 and 17:03?’ Meanwhile, giving us detailed manual controls and filters makes little more sense - the entire history of the tech industry tells us that actual normal people would never use them, even if they worked. People don't file.
I think the problem here is the implicit assumption that I want all 1000-1500 things. I don't, and neither does anyone else. What people want on Facebook is a feed of all the things people have actually posted. I want to see peoples' photos, and their status updates, and news articles they've shared.
I never ever want to see things people have liked, commented on or otherwise interacted with. How other people interact with Facebook is irrelevant to me. In fact, the whole system of people just commenting with someone's name to share something with them is very annoying.
>However, some people find computers frustrating, stupid or boring. Such a person probably wouldn't enjoy a job working with them all the time - and it's difficult to build the skills that let you advance your career if you're averse to or bored by practising them.
It's funny really because I thought I was perfect for software development as a teenager. Already knew how to program, spent a huge amount of my free time on a computer, good at maths and sciences in general, etc.
Once I actually got into software development I found the whole thing rather irksome. The company I worked for was a great place to work full of really lovely people, free lunches, paid internships (yay NZ), etc. But software development? Nope. Awful industry. Computers are shit.
As soon as I got out of software, I immediately found my interest in programming as a hobby come back. Unsurprisingly people don't really like doing something as a hobby when they're paid to do it for 40 hours per week already.
>Web forums sucked though. Slashdot figured out the right idea, the entire conversation loaded at once, one big page, it took the rest of the web a lot time to catch up.
Web forums were so much better than what we have today. I miss being active on multiple phpBB2 forums. Different communities, different norms. None of this everything-is-a-subreddit shit.
Having children with a sibling isn't anywhere near as dangerous as people think it is. People seem to think it nearly guarantees birth defects. It really doesn't.