Wouldn't it be possible to write some kind of local proxy server with MITM for HTTPS that modifies scripts and supplies the missing functionality for ublock origin?
There is not much need for a company like the one selling adblock plus to springer etc. I don't see any court going after ublock origin and there is no reason that ublock origin would be threatened by this in any way. However, the actions from google with manifest v3 are a real threat, as well as any obligation to use real name accounts to access services like newspapers or youtube.
If you right click a link and open in new window (or middle click), the frameset was gone and only the piece in the frame was visible. Also you could not bookmark anything. I remember doing a frameset per content frame url automatically and also redirecting to that frameset from inside the page via javascript if the content frame's url was directly opened.
How does this work? Do they demand you to use Azure for your servers so they get a discount? Or do you have to create instances of your product in e.g. VMs that are put in their Azure account? Did you have to completeley leave every last bit of gcp behind? How is this checked by MS?
Related: If you send an e-mail to "Some Name with something interesting" <[email protected]> and company.org runs Microsoft Exchange and [email protected] is in Active Directory, then Exchange will erase "Some Name with something interesting" <[email protected]> and replace it with a pointer to Active Directory and you will never see "Some Name with something interesting".
Like the opposite effect as discussed here. o365 is probably doing the same
While security software and antivirus deserve all the injection blocking they may get, we must also consider how to bypass these mechanism when it's about reenabling adblocking by injecting DLLs in the browser for request blocking etc.
>I'm also happy to answer any questions anyone has about the movie or about that time at Fog Creek
Why was FogBugz for your server discontinued silently? I think you had build something really great at the end with the change to .net and the plugin architecture (which would have made it possible to do customizations even in the cloud). Also how kiln integrated was great.
Did key people leave so that FogBugz basically stopped to be maintained anymore? Where you still around when they removed the plugins and tried to put it back and maybe switched to elastic search etc.?
They activate 1-4 LEDs in series depending on where in the half wave of the 120V AC we are. That's understandable, but I don't get how about 60V is okay for one LED?
One LED has a forward current of max. 3V, doesn't it? By partitioning the up to 120V into 4 phases, it does not cover a mere 4 LEDs in series.
Do they have to put 15 in series for the first section in the schematics and another 15 for the thign called "LED 2", etc.?
Are there LEDs with forward currents of 60V available?