There has been a much stronger capital supply than in a shattered group of countries.
The EU does not exist as a unit, it's 27 sovereign states cooperating. In the EU the single market is an achievement across countries, but can't compare with single large internal markets.
China as the second economy of the world managed to succeed with a centralised plan.
So I think market size and economic power is a bigger indicator than centralised vs not.
practicing computation is important in math education, I think Eastern Europeans and Asians often have an advantage due to working through 5-10K problems / year
Looking at your statements from a Hungarian perspective, I think you are wrong
1. The USSR always discriminated non Russian speakers.
2. Collectivisation and military occupation was used as a large scale wealth transfer. In addition forced reeducation camps and population swaps were used to put Russian observers into positions where they were first amongst equals
Russian imperialism has always been the core of the Soviet union.
When people rised up against Russian occupation they got slaughtered in Hungary in 1956 and later in 1968 with the Prague Spring Russian oppression continued
I watched his video and personally feel emotional intelligence is often used as a proxy of communication skills in general with agreeable motifs when needed
I feel there’s a strong skill aspect to it as the very emotionally intelligent people I came across had a lot of communication experience
If it was about your own home would you frame it the same way of „some land“? If it was your own family shelled or your own country would you argue the same way?