deesun108·hace 8 años·discuss> This might not be true for much longer, maybe only a couple of decades.nobody can estimate out to decades. anyone who claim to be able to do so is a charlatan.> If this is in the top 10, it's damning with faint praise1.2B people play games worldwide....what's your point?>This is really just #1 repeatedno it's not. having assets and the ability to generate even more assets are seperate issues (look at Saudi Arabia post oil)> Innovations and technology can be stolenUntil you try selling your stolen technology in US or Europe or Japan....oh wait you can't.> This is basically #4 repeatedpopulation having asset is different than the country having corporations.
deesun108·hace 8 años·discussEngland didn't have the natural resources, population, geography, techno-centric culture to sustain its leadership. US does.
deesun108·hace 8 años·discussHow about US1.) having the biggest economy in the world, and growing 3% per year2.) having the biggest worldly influential movie business3.) having the biggest worldly influential video game business4.) having 40% of assets in the world5.) having most of the innovations in technology6.) having most of the biggest corporations7.) having the most brands8.)......etcetcetc
nobody can estimate out to decades. anyone who claim to be able to do so is a charlatan.
> If this is in the top 10, it's damning with faint praise
1.2B people play games worldwide....what's your point?
>This is really just #1 repeated
no it's not. having assets and the ability to generate even more assets are seperate issues (look at Saudi Arabia post oil)
> Innovations and technology can be stolen
Until you try selling your stolen technology in US or Europe or Japan....oh wait you can't.
> This is basically #4 repeated
population having asset is different than the country having corporations.