All I want is a label telling me what I’m buying. My prejudices against chocolate eggs or RoundUp will affect my purchasing decision.
Besides... data??? That’s a laugh! How do you a proper chronic long-term study in biology? Who’d be clean enough for your control group? What chronic conditions are you looking for (I.e are we only looking for yet another thing that causes cancer -yawn-, or are we looking for other ailments which appear to plague us today)?
Sure, everyone claims their study achieves the above, but then who reproduces the work to double check it?
I’ll stick to my luddite prejudices that serve me quite well. Just let me know what you put in my food, and I’ll decide if I want to buy it or not
(btw, guess who are the folks lobbying against labeling laws)
Like you mentioned, CO is bad for us because of our hemoglobin. Otherwise I could imagine life using an otherwise chemically interesting molecule like CO (it can oxide further).
CO2... not so interesting. Aside from the reaction to make CaCO (?) and acidic when dissolved in water it’s quite limited being fully oxidized.
You need the ability to make things out of your molecules. Stuff at the ground state are boring!
Plants expand energy (otherwise wasted sunlight) to convert CO2 into O2 to make an interesting molecules, namely starch with which they can do something. If they had an endless supply of starches, they wouldn’t have bothered evolving with photosynthesis - just like we don’t care for photosynthesis since we have plants.
O2 is a triplet state molecule, so it has huge kinetic barriers for reactions. > No alien species advanced enough to look at us would assume we’d burn just because we have 0.21 Po2
The fact that there is excess of a reactant really means that there is an ability for interesting reactions, and therefore life. Ash cannot be animate because it’s (basically) at ground level and does not have the free energy to do anything.
I’m very proud to be Italian, and proud and love my countrymen.
If I were a Swiss, though, I would not leave my rifle, or any valuable, around in a Swiss train station if Italians are around. Or English, French, Germans, etc.
I wouldn’t be afraid if there were a group of Japanese though.
Hydrocarbons have very similar energy/mole and therefore energy/volume, energy/mass ratios.
This relationship breaks down for very short HC (methane, basic alcohols).
Differences in effective energy density result from the combustion cycle used: Otto is better than Diesel for the same compression ratio, but you can’t easily get high compression ratio
Hydrocarbons have very similar energy/mole and therefore energy/volume, energy/mass ratios.
This relationship breaks down for very short HC (methane, basic alcohols).
Differences in effective energy density result from the combustion cycle used: Otto is better than Diesel for the same compression ratio, but you can’t easily get high compression ratio w/ Otto. Therefore Diesels are, typically, more efficient.
However, if you use methane (high compression) in an Otto cycle with turbo compounding, you’ll probably beat diesel. But then you have NOx emissions
First, the “people” are being prosecuted because they have vaginas - they are women.
Second, given the Newtonian consequences of 80lb of fully armed soldier, I think the OPs original sarcasm at their cowardice is not out of place.