I had assumed the purpose of the data was more in generalising across variegated input sources to better allow the drones to fly on their own in urban settings, aka, adapt more readily to randomness?
Better datasets for multimodal training etc.
I am not joking though, I really would consider any data generated on public assets to be considered "releasable" to the public.
How many people should get killed by self-driving cars because the company making the cars didn't have enough data to train proper models?
I still feel like this is a perfect example of why we should be asking for our data to be disclosed to the public. If I take a picture of some public point of interest, they end up tagging it with their metadata and selling it, well, that's what I agreed to by not reading 20 pages of T&C's right?
But the value in that data is in the liveliness right, so at some point, would it not make sense for that data to be considered a public asset?
Why do we not demand this data be released regularly (given that the inverse tech could be developed using this as well)? If it can be used to train things used for war, could it not equally be used to train better lifesaving tech (in which case, the data should be made available to the public)?
Remember when copilot released? It was running some openai thing at the time, now you can choose from many models sure, but if you want a BMW, buy a BMW, don't buy a Nissan with badly strapped on BMW decals.
Do you mean you aren't able to use AI to make software?
The thing you fear is the thing that you could just use to improve yourself?
Why fear a shovel?
Also, I never claimed to be a good programmer either.
Just don't see the point fearing something that makes it infinitely easier and faster to get work done.
I feel like every person stating things of this nature are literally not able to communicate effectively (though this is not a barrier anymore, you can get a dog to vibe code games with the right workflow, which to me seems like quite an intellectual thing to be able to do.
Despite that, you will make this argument when trying to use copilot to do something, the worst model in the entire industry.
If an AI can replace you at your job, you are not a very good programmer.
I am not joking though, I really would consider any data generated on public assets to be considered "releasable" to the public. How many people should get killed by self-driving cars because the company making the cars didn't have enough data to train proper models?