15+ years embedded systems specialist. Chief Innovator at Cylenk, Lecturer at FH Graubünden. Ex-GE/Alstom, medical devices, energy IoT. M.Sc. EPFL. Available for consulting/contracts or senior technical roles. Specialized in compliance-ready IoT, prototype-to-production, technical debt reduction.
Independent of section 240 or other laws, I would argue that search engine operators are content publishers as soon as we don't know how they choose the order of the results. Same for social media feeds.
Curating is a form of publishing, and following an algorithm is not curating per se, but, if that algorithm is non-transparent, and unknown to the user, it is the same end result...
In school when we got introduced to calculator, the teacher told us that he was not here to teach it to us. Only maybe guide us, we had a few lessons of us sitting down with the manual and having to learn (mostly by ourselves, but he would also help) how to use the calculator we chose. After that, it was to each its own, he wouldn't give any explanations...
This is IMHO fair, he was anyway teaching us math, not using a calculator.
I really think that you are onto something there. Or maybe a bloat index calculating the ratio between user content and downloaded content. Like 1kB of text but with 2 MB of JavaScript/CSS etc would give you an index of 2000 whereas if you only had 23 kB of JavaScript/CSS etc, it would 23.
A big part of learning is also in the social interaction. VR, no matter how good, will just never match that. You don't only need information, you also need interactions, real life interaction...
I think VR might help to some subjects, but having an all-VR experience seems an awful thing to me...
Local models are quite efficient as well.