Interesting approach. But I guess most of the people who uses AI now, have already a feeling, if some text is prepared by AI or not :)
I would point here to another issue - I guess most of the newly created public texts over the internet are at least passed through AI, just to polish and simplify it. So AI-style itself might be not that bad, if there is some interesting and newly invented idea behind. So the bigger problem, from my point of view, is that it's hard to distinguish: if certain AI-generated text has a good idea behind, or it is just a AI-garbage out of top-10 search result from google to certain topic.
That brings me an idea that it could be useful to have a metric like "newness" or "novelty" in addition to marking text as AI-generated. But seems like it is totally another direction :)
That's an interesting thing... Normally if I have only one session, I just open it and say "go on" :) Claude automatically re-reads previous context and continues from stopped point.
But it is interesting, how could it work (if it works) when you have a bunch of agents, stopped simultaneously? Are all of them have stored session context? (Sorry if questions are dumb, I'm more or less beginner here)
Hi! The idea sounds interesting, this is kind of regular process. But my question would be - normally I do clarifications within dialog mode, asking AI to add needed details and correcting it to proper direction. Sometimes AI prompt extension goes wrong direction, thus I would avoid automatic use for me.
But it might be most interesting for me as an automatic calculation of "vagueness" and in this case automatically to switch to that dialog clarification mode.
I would point here to another issue - I guess most of the newly created public texts over the internet are at least passed through AI, just to polish and simplify it. So AI-style itself might be not that bad, if there is some interesting and newly invented idea behind. So the bigger problem, from my point of view, is that it's hard to distinguish: if certain AI-generated text has a good idea behind, or it is just a AI-garbage out of top-10 search result from google to certain topic.
That brings me an idea that it could be useful to have a metric like "newness" or "novelty" in addition to marking text as AI-generated. But seems like it is totally another direction :)