HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

jasrys

no profile record

Submissions

USCO: Copyright and Artificial Intelligence Part 2 Copyrightability Report [pdf]

copyright.gov
2 points·by jasrys·el año pasado·0 comments

comments

jasrys
·el año pasado·discuss
NASA tested one at Marshall about a year ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UShD03eG9IU
jasrys
·hace 2 años·discuss
No one. At least in the US, copyright requires human authorship.[1]

There are several ongoing cases, probably most prominently the Thaler v. Perlmutter case. [2]

[1] https://www.copyright.gov/ai/ai_policy_guidance.pdf

[2] https://www.copyright.gov/ai/docs/us-brief-for-appellees.pdf
jasrys
·hace 2 años·discuss
AI generated music is not protected by copyright, at least in the US, since copyright can only affix to works created by humans (the "human authorship requirement").[1][2] Without copyright protection, there is no "economic value" -- at least directly tied to the songs themselves. AI generated songs are not paid royalties at e.g. The Mechanical Licensing Collective for US streaming use.[3]

[1] https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-03-16/pdf/2023-0... (Copyright Registration Guidance section)

[2] https://ipwatchdog.com/2022/02/23/thaler-loses-ai-authorship...

[3] https://www.copyright.gov/ai/USCO-Guidance-Letter-to-The-MLC...
jasrys
·hace 2 años·discuss
You can read more about what that deal covered — and didn’t cover — here on NMPA’s site:

https://www.nmpa.org/twitch-makes-deal-with-nmpa-but-streame...
jasrys
·hace 2 años·discuss
They haven't licensed publishing (at least not yet). Source: am publisher