HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

jstan65536

no profile record

comments

jstan65536
·hace 2 meses·discuss
Backups were not Instructure’s problem. Hackers using the threat of exposing private information to extort Instructure’s customers was the problem.
jstan65536
·hace 4 años·discuss
You should have a look at Standard Ruby https://github.com/testdouble/standard

In particular, a lot from the lightning talk resonates with me.
jstan65536
·hace 4 años·discuss
A lot about the Rubocop philosophy really grates on me. Many of its preferences are arbitrary and don't, in my opinion, contribute to code readability. Many others are good as a rule of thumb but cause more harm than good when they are blindly enforced by a robot. A recent example from my work went something like this:

  if some_verbose_condition && some_other_verbose_condition
    do_the_thing unless excluded_case || other_excluded_case
  end
Rubocop changed this to

  if (some_verbose_condition && some_other_verbose_condition) && !(excluded_case || other_excluded_case)
    do_the_thing
  end
which is just worse

and then it had the gall to complain that the line containing the `if` was too long.

That said, if you disable half its rules, Rubocop can be a useful tool. We've long had a list of database migration best practices, which we've built up over the years to ensure changes to our application's database schema don't cause downtime or other issues. Lately I've been writing cops to automate checks against these practices.

Useful feedback: "Heads up: changing the type of that column is going to lock the users table and bring the site down; see $BEST_PRACTICES_DOCUMENT"

Not useful feedback: "zomg ur cyclomatic complexity si 2 high!!1"