HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

justchilly1

no profile record

comments

justchilly1
·hace 5 años·discuss
I think Austin has a decent chance. 1) No prop 13 which keeps locks California property taxes at purchase price. It means long-term residents pay very little tax on very expensive property, so are unwillingly to sell (better to cash out with a refi and let the property keep appreciating, which creating real estate scarcity, pushing up prices, etc... 2) Austinites are well aware of the failings of California cities such, and fearful of making the same mistakes. Even the left leaning voters that flee to Austin from deep blue cities are by and large not the same group of voters that push progressive policies. They're well-off tech bro liberals that want higher quality of life, lower crime, and lower taxes.
justchilly1
·hace 5 años·discuss
Yes but not really. Qualified immunity only protects officers from civil cases (being sued) however SB2, signed just a couple months ago removed much of those protections. Also the court of public opinion can be just as damaging as any civil settlement.

https://sd35.senate.ca.gov/news/2021-09-30-governor-newsom-s...
justchilly1
·hace 5 años·discuss
Both the mayor and the author of the ordinance (and SFGate op-ed) are playing semantics. Yes the police can access real-time video (i.e. without complex pre-approval process from board of supervisors), but only when there's imminent risk of "danger of death or serious physical injury."

This of course hampers enforcement against quality of life crimes, but even for potentially violent crimes puts the police at risk of breaking the law if it's later determined that their use case didn't meet the criteria. It's very likely police officers are hesitant to use the tools at knowing the high likelihood of prosecution.