HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

knrdev

no profile record

comments

knrdev
·el mes pasado·discuss
Imagine this company getting real power. This is just a purest nightmare evil shit i've seen out of any of them. Maybe they're already controlled by Slophos.
knrdev
·hace 2 meses·discuss
Drones need operators.

So how are AI weapons a broadly dumb idea?
knrdev
·hace 2 meses·discuss
You are not up to date about AI weapons.

March 30, 2026: https://thedefender.media/en/2026/03/fedorov-shared-info-abo...

> At the same time, the team is developing simulation and modelling environments for testing solutions, AI infrastructure for rapid system deployment, and tools that can be immediately integrated into military units.
knrdev
·hace 2 años·discuss
Kotaku.. I remember that name.

> Private equity-owned G/O took control of the suite of websites in 2019 following former parent Gawker’s bankruptcy.

It is very brave of them to write about zombies and graves.
knrdev
·hace 3 años·discuss
Have you really gained or learned anything from this?

They just benefit from the conflict between opposing, incompatible viewpoints. Musk especially seems to like it. It's primarily a for-profit enterprise fueled by hate and propaganda, just like those "legacy" things it's supposed to replace.
knrdev
·hace 3 años·discuss
For the brand, maybe, but for users? Users don't get this output by accident.

Also, API fetching isn't that interesting to be in the news.
knrdev
·hace 3 años·discuss
The training process probably doesn't care and may do unexpected things at scale. You will most likely not be able to outsmart it. It only works to predict the next token, so fake info may even improve its spam detection skills.
knrdev
·hace 3 años·discuss
> [...] society’s increasingly indiscriminate access to large language models as a serious concern [...]

Just wait a little more, sweet regulatory prince.
knrdev
·hace 3 años·discuss
Very strange. I gave this problem to GPT-3.5 and it answered `f(x)=1/x`. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13YrZLBmu7A gives the same solution. GPT-4 failed but was close. Maybe GPT-3.5 is smarter ;)

Query i used was: ``` Can you think step by step about this math problem and solve it?

Let R+ denote the set of positive real numbers. Find all functions f : R+ → R+ such that for each x ∈ R+, there is exactly one y ∈ R+ satisfying xf(y) + yf(x) <= 2. ```

Response: https://pastebin.com/sTXM9kLt

Edit: Maybe i should say Bing not GPT-4 because i asked it there.
knrdev
·hace 3 años·discuss
Sure. Here it is User: https://scary.website.com/scary-workflow
knrdev
·hace 3 años·discuss
> Wonder what sparked this.

Being left behind. Losers want to catch up.