m_sahaf · HackerTrans

hace 4 mesesdiscuss

Brilliant. I wonder what limits we can hit with this setup. What if local postgres is installed and its data directory location is on TigerFS, what are the trade-offs here? Could placing SQLite file on TigerFS mount increase durability for Litestream setup? Is it possible to somehow run have TigerFS database storing data on TigerFS?

m_sahaf

hace 4 mesesdiscuss

How can someone add platforms to the guide? I want to add Caddy

m_sahaf

hace 8 mesesdiscuss

ElGamal says he uses them interchangeably. He says TLS exists for historical reasons, but the essence of the technology is the same. I got into the habit of using SSL/TLS.

m_sahaf

hace 9 mesesdiscuss

Allow me to introduce you to Hurl: https://hurl.dev/

m_sahaf

hace 9 mesesdiscuss

> If that person found another problem with Caddy, I think they are less likely to report it to you because of this.

Given they're aware of previous discussion and the stance on the feature request, I don't think they're deterred by the discussion here. Your addition of fuel to fire here is the very thing that's not helping.

> If they did report it, I would think you are very likely to dismiss it because of who they are, not the contents of the bug report.

That's a huge assumption on your behalf.

m_sahaf

hace 9 mesesdiscuss

It's a repeat complaint from the same person who admits bringing it up before. The way they framed their complaint is, again, snide.

> That’s a long way beyond exasperation, that’s a massive overreaction.

Your reaction to Francis is _the_ overreaction. Francis simply said to OP to put their money where their mouth is. The "slander" comment comes later as a general statement on why this subject has become annoying.

Stop being hung up on Francis' response. The niche feature was discussed at length multiple times. You're welcome to search the web for all the conversations we had on the subject. Caddy has been around for 11 years. We've seen this subject more than you've seen it brought up. Again, OP referenced the discussion on the issue tracker in one of the earlier times they brought it up. They _admit_ it's niche. What's the point of continuously bringing it up?

m_sahaf

hace 9 mesesdiscuss

This is being blown out of proportion. You're discounting an entire project and your experience of the software over a person expressing exasperation over an inconsequential feature (not a bug) that even the author of curl had his run through and frustration. The request was not dismissed, rather it was discussed at length on our issue tracker. The OP knows it was discussed at length because they linked to the discussion thread in the earlier times they brought this up. Moreover, the way they presented it this time is snide, agree or not. To quote Matt's statement of the project being "stable and mature" just to say "except you didn't implement my niche feature" (yes, editorialized) is not criticism nor a feature request. It's veiled instigation hiding behind plausible deniability.

Anyways, on the feature request, Caddy is not the only software who disagrees with it being valid, and curl had their back-and-forth on it. There's no legitimate bug being dismissed, and you can go through the issue tracker to audit it. Equating this discussion with 37signals or Signal is false equivalence.

Disclaimer: Caddy maintainer

m_sahaf

hace 2 añosdiscuss

Citing that particular blog post isn't making the point you think it makes. To quote:

> The most striking piece of new knowledge for me was learning about failure modes. Nginx will fail by refusing or dropping connections, Caddy will fail by slowing everything down.

Do you want your clients failing to load your website at all? Is this the best approach to serving users?

comments