Huh, might finally get around to Apple garbage. Closing your users to one internal system with internal hardware works for speed and maintenance issues([with users] look at early Windows with it's struggles and blue screens despite it's prevalent use across various hardware systems. But it doesn't work with devs. Dude if I can't code your stuff or for your platform on my shitty little linux, I have zero interest in working on your platform or utilizing your tech stack.
Yeah I got jipped at AT&T with a bunch of add-ons which were not explained and ended up with like three lines. Flat rates are the way to go but something has to be done about issues like employees conspiring.
I had a small cryptocurrency take off with just a few thousand people clamoring and begging me for more. Going from a basement nerd to a tiny, tiny, tiny, tiny unknown internet celeb got to my head and as soon as I started getting negative comments, "FUD" and the like and my picture was being shown around I had a nervous breakdown (amongst other stressors). I would say, do what Ferris has said and ignore all comments, negative and positive or try and take criticism abstractly.
Uhhh, I have an idea how sha-256 works but not blake3. Is blake3 better for storing passwords? If not, what is the go-to recommended hash for password storage of say, a simple front-facing app for consumers.
>>The only set people with a financial incentive to “shill” are bitcoin/cryptocurrency supporters. More Shilling == higher prices == more lambos for those on the top of the pyramid.
Strawman. I won't answer it.
>>To think there is some dark force out there shilling for big banks to scare us from adopting a technology that supports a few transactions a second and requires more energy than several small nations combined.... pretty naive.
But central banks, bankers, big time capitalists and the federal government would never do anything outside of public interests?
For the record I don't own any cryptocurrency and never will because I don't believe in it's merits like you, but I am not so naive to think that private interests wouldn't collude against a digital asset highly risky to their profitable margins.
The trust issue is far overblown. Blockchain is much more about digital ownership of assets. You own your Facebook, your Google search results, etc, etc. You may not physically host it, but own the data that is generated from it and can decide to co-opt it into a larger tray for money if you wish or to remain private. It's much more about freedom on a conceptual level if we zoom out then about simple immutable ledgers; which are just shared key-value pair databases across many nodes, nothing special.