You have a really sharp eye. I think you could be an artist yourself :)
Yes, you’re technically correct, but I believe you won’t be in a few months, or maybe a year.
I’m saying this from a point of awareness. I do know about all of those issues, but I also can’t wait until they change for good.
For instance, style consistency. Yeah, AI still can’t keep it fully consistent, but I think it will be fixed, the same way character consistency is almost fixed now. And that’s already huge progress.
Yeah, I think the point is that software has always moved by letting go of lower-level control in exchange for more leverage. We've been through this quite a few times already. We have outgrew many technologies and ways of working in this history
And I agree. The craft doesn’t disappear, it just moves from typing and debugging every detail to judgment, taste, testing, and shaping messy systems into something useful.
>>> IMO -- and apparently the opinion of others -- adding an AI-generated picture every single paragraph in your article in which the primary purpose is to, presumably, discuss a topic rather than show off your AI-generated art, is in extremely poor taste. It's distracting, it makes it hard to focus on the text, and to be perfectly blunt, nobody is impressed by your ability to create pictures by AI.
I do respect your opinion, I did that intentionally and I want to keep it as my style.
Using images extensively and use metaphorical language::))))
I’ve been thinking the same thing. AI makes it possible for us to be generalists again. One person, or a small team of generalists, can create and build things in a more human way, with everyone putting a piece of their soul into it.
It lets us be more involved, have more impact, and not just be one tiny cog in a huge machine, working on a small piece you can barely identify with in the bigger picture.