Yes, his definition of "hater" seems to be "a person who always disagrees with him or questions his success", whereas occasional disagreement just carries the "troll" label.
It is not very clever to write an essay like this in the abstract without naming concrete instances of "hating".
If the essay targets certain political activists on Twitter, sure, but pg has a history of calling Arc critics "trolls".
It is not very clever to write an essay like this in the abstract without naming concrete instances of "hating".
If the essay targets certain political activists on Twitter, sure, but pg has a history of calling Arc critics "trolls".