Fablepool spends Anthropic's inference budget and puts the output under MIT, thats not growing Anthropic's moat, its commoditizing it. Anthropic just sells the API calls either way.
The "agents as daemons" framing is the right one. The piece that bit me trying this: every scheduled run needs to be safely re-runnable, because the agent will occasionally retry a step it actually finished last cycle. Does CLAW.md have a convention for marking a step idempotent, or is that left to the prompt?