squirrelly·hace 7 años·discussORLY? Redshift is half the cost of Snowflake for any given level of performance. The bigger your dataset to wider the gap will be.
squirrelly·hace 7 años·discussHa, $500k/year is the amount a salesperson can knock off the cost of Teradata 100TB setup without calling their boss.As for ops stuff, I guess YMMV. We’ve never had any significant issues. Tuning is the same or less than on-prem systems IME.Perf is still pretty much unmatched in the cloud, especially perf/$. Try to do a join on 100tb in a competing system (e.g. BQ) and it won’t finish.
squirrelly·hace 7 años·discuss> Redshift falls over near the 100TB level.This is based on what? They have stated in various presentations that they have customers using 1pb clusters.
squirrelly·hace 7 años·discussSnowflake has one answer to every question. Use more compute == Spend more money. E.g. Q: “This query is 2x slower than Redshift?” A: $