I think you're underestimating the size of 200. ADA compliance is a worthy cause, but at that level of effort I think it would make more sense to create an advocacy group and try to bring about compliance through public pressure than individual lawsuits.
Nevertheless, I don't have a lot of sympathy for the business owner in this case. If you open a business in a non-compliant site 17 years after the ADA went into effect, and 13 years later still can't build a ramp, it might be time for another business to occupy that site.
When one person associated with the attorney is a plaintiff in 200 lawsuits, it does start to seem opportunistic.
Nevertheless, I can't understand why someone would open a cafe in 2007 at a site that wasn't compliant with a 1990 law without budgeting for bringing it into compliance.
> The prefix/postfix change is a red herring, that doesn't do anything
The prefix/postfix change does something to the reader. It's a distraction trying to figure out if that change was intended, whether the author knows it has no effect, or whether I'm wrong about the change having no effect.
I appreciate the author doing the hard work of fixing this, especially with the code in full view of the public, but if I were an official reviewer I'd ask to get all the unnecessary changes removed.
If these investments of yours were as much of a sure bet (or adequately sure bet) as you're suggesting, banks would simply cut out the middle-person (i.e. the borrower) and invest in these things directly.
I don't think it rises to the level of dishonesty, but I do think the writer should not have included something as unknowable and irrelevant as the possible hidden motives of these agencies.
Nevertheless, suing these agencies to prevent unwarranted surveillance is justified.
> [T]he other media encourages polarization and demonization of the other for dumb short term. That's a purely American phenomenon...
I don't think that's true. The tone of American political news nowadays doesn't seem that different than British newspapers in the 1990s. "It's the Sun wot won it" was an explicit boast about The Sun's polarizing influence... in 1992.
Of course both The Sun and Fox News in the US are part of Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. But if anything this style of news seems like it arrived in the UK ten or twenty years before it was manifest in the US.
Just because your economic situation is unsustainable where you are doesn't mean you'd be better off someplace else. If you arrive in a new city without a job and without connections, you're in trouble from the moment you get there.
I really like Bandcamp's articles. They're hyping material on their own platform of course, but you can give it a quick listen on-the-spot, and if you like it, that's a win for you, the artist, and Bandcamp. If you don't like it, you can move on to the next article straightaway. Moreover it's often stuff that no algorithm would have recommended to you.
I find it really hard to believe that the fund can be generating returns so consistently by pursuing a variety of different strategies over time.
It seems very unlikely that Renaissance/Medallion constantly finds these things, whereas other operations almost never do.
The conspiracy theorist in the back of my brain thinks that Renaissance/Medallion hires a lot of eggheads so they can plausibly claim to keep finding mathematical and operational edges, but the actual money-making strategy might be something else entirely.
Written language can be used to overturn history as well as reinforce it.
In this case, the article mentions "meatier yields", and that two-word combination by itself is something I would bet on in a fight against any article-length analysis of the 2008 crisis.
Governments are unlikely to give cryptocurrencies the same legal privileges as the currencies they issue.
As such, traceability will remain a risk for anyone receiving cryptocurrency payments. If a chain analysis reveals an illegal transaction as a precursor, it's going to be considered stolen goods, not money, as the article states.
This is terrible advice.