What Silicon Valley does better than anyone is create
exits. They know how to get people who they have made
money for to turn over a lot of that money to buy the
companies they have invested in. They know how to put on a
show to get a company to an IPO. They know how to go out
and get hundreds of millions of dollars to bridge companies
with 10s of millions in revenues to their IPO and more
importantly to make sure the IPO happens.
This is Mark Cuban. He sold Broadcast.com at the height of the dot com bubble for 6 billion dollars. 520,000 users sold to Yahoo for $11,000 apiece. startups which provide deluxe on-site benefits could extend
their daycare, meal and on-site walk-in health care to
people who have WIC or EBT cards and can show that they
live in the neighborhood. The bonus here? You can meet
actual people in your neighborhood.
I really, really, really want Anil Dash to try this with his own startup on Market Street in the middle of the Tenderloin. Send us the video. Show us how it's done, Anil! Practice what you preach. Men and women display patterns of behavioral and cognitive
differences that reflect varying hormonal influences on
brain development
By Doreen Kimura (May 13, 2002)
Men and women differ not only in their physical attributes
and reproductive function but also in many other
characteristics, including the way they solve intellectual
problems. For the past few decades, it has been
ideologically fashionable to insist that these behavioral
differences are minimal and are the consequence of
variations in experience during development before and
after adolescence. Evidence accumulated more recently,
however, suggests that the effects of sex hormones on brain
organization occur so early in life that from the start the
environment is acting on differently wired brains in boys
and girls. Such effects make evaluating the role of
experience, independent of physiological predisposition, a
difficult if not dubious task. The biological bases of sex
differences in brain and behavior have become much better
known through increasing numbers of behavioral,
neurological and endocrinological studies.
Sex differences in problem solving have been systematically
studied in adults in laboratory situations. On average, men
perform better than women at certain spatial tasks. In
particular, men seem to have an advantage in tests that
require the subject to imagine rotating an object or
manipulating it in some other way. They also outperform
women in mathematical reasoning tests and in navigating
their way through a route. Further, men exhibit more
accuracy in tests of target-directed motor skills--that is,
in guiding or intercepting projectiles.
Women, on average, excel on tests that measure recall of
words and on tests that challenge the person to find words
that begin with a specific letter or fulfill some other
constraint. They also tend to be better than men at rapidly
identifying matching items and performing certain precision
manual tasks, such as placing pegs in designated holes on a
board.
A graphic accompanies the full article: Review 1: Louann Brizendine, a neuropsychiatrist at the
University of California, San Francisco, explores
groundbreaking issues in brain science...Brizendine
graduated from the Yale University School of Medicine and
draws on research done at the Women's and Teen Girls' Mood
and Hormone Clinic, which she founded at UCSF in 1994.
Review 2 :This comprehensive new look at the hormonal
roller coaster that rules women's lives down to the
cellular level, "a user's guide to new research about the
female brain and the neurobehavioral systems that make us
women," offers a trove of information, as well as some
stunning insights. Though referenced like a work of
research, Brizedine's writing style is fully accessible.
Brizendine provides a fascinating look at the life cycle of
the female brain from birth ("baby girls will connect
emotionally in ways that baby boys don't") to birthing
("Motherhood changes you because it literally alters a
woman's brain-structurally, functionally, and in many ways,
irreversibly") to menopause (when "the female brain is
nowhere near ready to retire") and beyond.
There are tens of thousands of papers in this general area on Pubmed. Crimestop means the faculty of stopping short, as though by
instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It
includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to
perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest
arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being
bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable
of leading in a heretical direction.
The mind should develop a blind spot whenever a dangerous
thought presented itself. The process should be automatic,
instinctive. Crimestop, they called it in Newspeak.
He set to work to exercise himself in crimestop. He
presented himself with propositions -- 'the Party says the
earth is flat', 'the party says that ice is heavier than
water' -- and trained himself in not seeing or not
understanding the arguments that contradicted them. Boycotting the Nature Publishing Group
The Nature Publishing Group publishes not only the
prestigious journal Nature, but also many others. When this
company bought Scientific American, it raised the
institutional subscription price seven-fold. Now they are
insisting on quadrupling the fees for 67 journals to which
the University of California subscribes.
Right now, we pay them an average of $4,465 per year for
each journal we subscribe to. After the increase, this
would soar to $17,479 per year. In response, the University
of California is considering a system-wide boycott of the
Nature Publishing Group — for example, cancelling
subscriptions to all their journals.
Rowan Manning works for a gang of monopolistic rent-seekers who currently have the scientific community over a barrel. His salary comes from a closed-access model which is soon to be obsolete. Thus "cutting-edge" technology is actually highlighted as a fail! Max Levchin: The notion that diversity in an early team is
important or good is completely wrong. You should try to
make the early team as non-diverse as possible. There are a
few reasons for this. The most salient is that, as a
startup, you’re underfunded and undermanned. It’s a big
disadvantage; not only are you probably getting into
trouble, but you don’t even know what trouble that may be.
Speed is your only weapon. All you have is speed.
If you want to work in an environment full of rowanmannings, that is your prerogative. Many others will select out and find places where people who enjoy bullying others with modern taboos on gender and the like don't self-appoint themselves as priests. Do you really want a team member who spends their free time getting people to upvote their new heretic-finding software to the top of HN? Over the last decades, numerous researchers have
painstakingly collected, analyzed, dated, and calibrated
many data series that allow us to reconstruct climate
before the age of direct measurements. Such data come e.g.
from sediment drilling in the deep sea, from corals, ice
cores and other sources. Shaun Marcott and colleagues for
the first time assembled 73 such data sets from around the
world into a global temperature reconstruction for the
Holocene, published in Science. Or strictly speaking, many
such reconstructions: they have tried about twenty
different averaging methods and also carried out 1,000
Monte Carlo simulations with random errors added to the
dating of the individual data series to demonstrate the
robustness of their results.
Marcott et al.'s graphic states that their model reflects historical temperatures so accurately that it can measure the average temperature of the entire globe continuously back to 8000 years ago, to within a small fraction of 1 degree Celsius (i.e. the 1-sigma error bars). That is simply an extraordinary claim given:
I for one thank you for your contribution. Hacker News can be a bunch of jackasses at times.
You are absolutely right: distributed version control led to git, which completely changed programming. And though Satoshi didn't cite it by name it was almost certainly also part of the inspiration for Bitcoin and the blockchain, which has led to another $30B in collective market cap.
If you want a suggestion for what to do next, or what to advise, you can probably have a lot of impact (and make money) by getting involved in some of these new distributed ledger/ICO projects. You have the technical ability and it's now possible to monetize at the protocol level. Here are some links if you're interested:
https://www.smithandcrown.com/icos/
https://startupboy.com/2014/03/09/the-bitcoin-model-for-crow...
http://www.usv.com/blog/fat-protocols