The madness that is overlay networking and other brainfuck networking stacks that are normalized now due to Kubernetes and Docker are horrific. Moving to micro-VMs with each one having it's own unique IP and leveraging basic networking has paid us off in spades.
Which is exactly why there's a gigantic push for gender ideology, whiteness studies, and other grievance studies. Those steeped in the ideology are truly uneducated and will vote for those pushing these beliefs. They're pro-open immigration so the better workers will flood in, and the more diverse the workplace, the less likely they are to unionize.(https://www.jstor.org/stable/24810295).
>and the tendency of people to move out of states with laws that oppress them
This is categorically false. More people are moving to states like Texas, Florida, and Georgia than states like California and New York. Blacks are moving in droves back to the South.
Apache serving 21%?! What kind of websites use Apache in 2022? I haven't deployed a site on that dinosaur in over a decade at this rate. Nor have I used it as a reverse proxy in that timeframe.
>I asked a friend who just left med school. He laughed and said yes there's lots of evidence supporting this in his profession alone.
I just asked a friend who is a professor of medicine. She laughed and said no there's no evidence supporting this in her profession alone.
>He suggested you pick up a copy of "Principles of Transgender Medicine and Surgery" ISBN 1138857009 which was a required for one of his courses.
A book that covers transgender care for mentally ill men doesn't magically make them female. They are still human males, and will always be human males.
>It has hundreds of references by MDs,PHDs and the like on the medical side alone.
None of the MDs disagree with the fact that "gender affirming care" is for human males or females, and their biology is most definitely male or female. The grievance studies PhDs are not experts in science.
>He did agree that quantity is not quality and recommended to use "Directory of Open Access Journals" to access a large amount of peer reviewed research that does establish the science.
There are none that establish "the science", there is no science backing any of it. Again, grievance studies papers are not science.
>You should contact everyone referenced in the book/research papers and let them know they're incorrect
"You should contact Hitler and Goebbels and let them know they're incorrect about the Jews."
>Having an open mind to learn more information is not a weakness
I agree.
>I work in data science adjacent and it's fascinating to see new information being uncovered all the time that does fill in missing information about everything we know - or don't know.
Data science is not biology. There is no missing information. Humans are mammals, humans are sexually dimorphic and produce two gametes. The earth is round, not flat.
>While you may believe what you wish, the scientific AND medical AND psychological community disagrees with your assertion.
No they don't. "Scientific" is meaningless here, grievance studies are not science. Medical field deals with male and female humans, such is basic biology still taught in all university medical schools. Current medical books also cover male and female specific physiology (because there are only two types).
>There's more research happening into it in the past 10 years than in the past 100 years with some interesting research.
Quantity != quality. There were a lot of publications in the USSR that stated genetics was a false Western ploy.
>Unfortunately people are operating off 50+ years of knowledge
Some basic findings and facts don't change. The fact that we're carbon based organisms is 50+ old. The fact that we're sexually dimorphic mammals is 50+ year old.
>elementary schools or via religion.
Yes, Newchurch is definitely working this way.
>I don't expect this is an area of study for you, so that's probably why you're not aware of these advances.
There are no advances. You don't need to concentrate in an "area of study" to understand the fact that humans are sexually dimorphic. Grievance studies are not an "expert" field.
>At one point in time people thought the earth was flat or that people were only righthanded. I'm glad to part of the scientific community that embraces increasing knowledge regardless of how it challenges preconcieved notions.
And that science was settled decades/centuries ago, much like the fact that humans are male/female mammals. Thanks for making this point for me.
>Regardless, your claims relating to Lysenko are extremely hyperbolic at best
>There's lots of evidence going back to egyptian times supporting the science behind this.
No there isn't. There isn't any science behind this to begin with.
>Unfortunately most people only see the surface level sound bites thrown out in the media and make up their mind based on that - or what their own religion has pushed forward.
Exactly right.
>I suspect that fifty years from now we will have built on all the existing knowledge (including historical) and have a more refined understanding put together.
Hopefully we'll continue with the knowledge of science based biological facts that are no longer in vogue: humans are a dimorphic species that come in male in female. That is what science has taught us.
Fifty years from now we'll look back at this time the same way we look back at Lysenkoism. Sad to see science has been so corrupted by the religion of Newchurch [0].
This is a /r/selfawarewolves-tier post. Bravo.
>Anytime I hear people generically blaming "The Media" for everything I just roll my eyes.
My post outlined multiple specific instances where the media dropped the ball. It by definition is not "generically blaming."