> If it can do this in 13kb, it makes me wonder what it could do with more bytes.
Maybe I misunderstand, but is this not just the first baby steps of an LLM written in JS? "what it could do with more bytes" is surely "GPT2 in javascript"?
we're not all lucky enough to work in places like that. Most of the meetings I go to are interactive ones where I'm contributing to the conversation, but every now and then we have these company-wide meetings that we all have to be at. They are a total waste of time and money, where 300+ employees are lectured on the sales performance stats and our business goals, and our CEO gets angry when people have their cameras off
I think this bit from the FAQ is the info everyone on here is looking for
> Internally, the EXT platform is split into two parts. The first part is the frontend, which is built using Electron; the second is the control application, which is shipped as a separate executable file. When the frontend is launched, it runs the control application as a child process.
So basically EXT is an electron app which wraps around small web apps offered through ext.store
There were days when I didn't get all 3 things (or any of the things) done. There were days when I achieved more. But crucially, I never committed myself to more than 3.
I never felt stressed by my todo list as it was very manageable.
My kids are playing Monkey Island 2 this week, and its the opposite. I remember it being pixelated (and it is) but the backdrops are astonishingly pretty, the colors vibrant, the animation quirky and fun.
I know we're all biased here, as coders, but I don't see this as the end, but rather the beginning of something.
In the article, the non-coder was able to produce code with an AI's help, and therefore, coders are doomed.
But in fact what happened is it enabled two "developers" to offload the menial work and focus on the product itself.
The development of electric workshop tools didn't make woodworkers obsolete, it just enabled them to do the work of 5 people, and do it easier and faster.
We are moving from the era of hand-tools in coding.
The real risk is that we're going to see a lot of cheap shitty furniture made by people with no skills, but at least ChatGPT isn't going to chop anyones fingers off.
> If it can do this in 13kb, it makes me wonder what it could do with more bytes.
Maybe I misunderstand, but is this not just the first baby steps of an LLM written in JS? "what it could do with more bytes" is surely "GPT2 in javascript"?